Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Sugarsmacks420 t1_j5rqxc8 wrote

NASA's nuclear anything always have "accidents" on the way up. Maybe take the lesson something doesn't want your nuclear shit up there.

−8

Codydw12 t1_j5rxv5y wrote

> Other benefits to space travel include increased science payload capacity and higher power for instrumentation and communication. In a nuclear thermal rocket engine, a fission reactor is used to generate extremely high temperatures. The engine transfers the heat produced by the reactor to a liquid propellant, which is expanded and exhausted through a nozzle to propel the spacecraft. Nuclear thermal rockets can be three or more times more efficient than conventional chemical propulsion.

> NASA, the Department of Energy (DOE), and industry are also developing advanced space nuclear technologies for multiple initiatives to harness power for space exploration. Through NASA’s Fission Surface Power project, DOE awarded three commercial design efforts to develop nuclear power plant concepts that could be used on the surface of the Moon and, later, Mars.

> NASA and DOE are working another commercial design effort to advance higher temperature fission fuels and reactor designs as part of a nuclear thermal propulsion engine. These design efforts are still under development to support a longer-range goal for increased engine performance and will not be used for the DRACO engine.

3

Sugarsmacks420 t1_j5svt2o wrote

Hey you know what else you can make from spent nuclear fuel? Nuclear weapons, but of course, they would never do that, just ask them.

−3

Codydw12 t1_j5tdkgg wrote

So should we stop developing any new technology for fear of its weaponization? Should we stop drilling petrol of fear it could become napalm?

2

Sugarsmacks420 t1_j5tl2z5 wrote

It would take a hell of a lot of napalm to equal the destructive effect of a nuclear weapon, why one would say that comparison is ridiculous.

−1

Codydw12 t1_j5tqjpk wrote

That doesn't negate my point that fearing a technology because someone could weaponize it is stupid.

1

Sugarsmacks420 t1_j5tr177 wrote

Depends on the technology, and its not a IF with humans, its a when, when you say could you are trying to act like humans have some sort of limit to destruction. If a technology can be used for war, it has been, that sums up humanity.

0

Codydw12 t1_j5tsad7 wrote

The history of humankind is the history of warfare? Thanks for being the first person ever to point that out.

Nuclear technologies are incredibly powerful and can be dangerous, I will not deny that. But it is a tool the same as any other. Just because it can be used as a weapon does not mean other aspects can be thrown aside purely out of fear, same I believe of many up coming technologies such as AI and automation.

2

Sugarsmacks420 t1_j5ttvyx wrote

Humans can not be trusted with nuclear anything in space period. On top of that the fact the government has no problem flying up some cesium which could have catastrophic consequences like Fukishima says loads about those humans to begin with.

1

Codydw12 t1_j5txlpu wrote

So then what? Humanity as a whole finally unites together, something which has never been done before, all to stop technogical progression? Space infastructure will become limited to solar which is itself just a byproduct of the Sun's nuclear fussion?

2

Sugarsmacks420 t1_j5w4jtt wrote

Humanity unites? Maybe after about 4 billion die off

1

Codydw12 t1_j5w5c71 wrote

Oh so you're just a doomer who just believes that people just need to die.

1