Submitted by Hall_Pitiful t3_zusumf in Futurology
ninjasaid13 t1_j1p8ix3 wrote
Reply to comment by GrayBox1313 in What will cheap available AI-generated images lead to? Video? Media? Entertainment? by Hall_Pitiful
>AI has no ability to think about on its own because it doesn’t have feeling, joy, empathy, humanity, trauma, desire, pain etc
are you saying emotions are a prerequisite for sentience?
some people separate the ability to feel things like light and heat and the ability to perceive emotions in sentience.
GrayBox1313 t1_j1p8le6 wrote
Art isn’t scientific. It’s personal expression. The artist puts their own emotion into the work. You read about Van Gogh and his inner pain is seen throughout his work.
What is the AI putting into the work? What is it expressing? What is it thinking about? What is it feeling?
ninjasaid13 t1_j1p972k wrote
I edited my comment to reflect something else.
>Art isn’t scientific. It’s personal expression. The artist puts their own emotion into the work. You read about Van Gogh and his inner pain is seen throughout his work.
I think there's a difference in philosophy in art between us.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments