Submitted by F1NNTORIO t3_zmisk3 in Futurology
PM_ME_YOUR_WOLOLO t1_j0cuuq8 wrote
Reply to comment by ThePowderhorn in 5 second toaster and kettle by F1NNTORIO
I had to look this up because I didn't remember why either https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Alternating_current#:~:text=Alternating%20current%20(AC)%20is%20the,transmitting%20electricity%20over%20long%20distances. but apparently it's more efficient (less energy loss in most circumstances)
PsikoticWanderer t1_j0duw2u wrote
I am an electronics engineer. AC current travels long distances on a conductor while losing very little energy. DC current loses energy in the form of heat as it travels on a conductor. Centralized power grids liked we have today based on DC are not possible.
When AC shorts to ground a local thermal event occurs causing localized damage. When DC+ shorts to DC- it heats the whole conductor path from the point of contact back to the source and damages or destroys all conductors in that circuit. In the event of a short AC repairs will be much cheaper.
Google Edison Tesla, they had a years-long feud over AC vs DC power grid. An elephant may have been involved.
PM_ME_YOUR_WOLOLO t1_j0dv3kp wrote
Thank you for the explanation! Yeah I do recall learning about Edison and Teslas feud over AC vs. DC. I’m a software engineer so this isn’t my wheelhouse at all
PsikoticWanderer t1_j0e7gap wrote
I do software too. Test dev for an automotive manufacturer so I get to build test stands and program them. Fun stuff.
PM_ME_YOUR_WOLOLO t1_j0enmd6 wrote
Oooo that is pretty cool
Tree-farmer2 t1_j0egvx8 wrote
Didn't DC motors at the time cause sparks and AC solved this?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments