Submitted by el_gee t3_y7381v in Futurology
Thai_Lord t1_isscy0x wrote
No it hasn't.
You're talking to numbers that are following a formula in real time.
KurushSoter t1_issdom9 wrote
This is bizarrely similar to the Christian argument against necromancy
intentamos_de_nuevo t1_issgxvw wrote
They didn't argue against anything tho...
TripSackNKickBack t1_issmni4 wrote
And I bet you think Christianity has no ties to psychedelic mushrooms or weed because it’s never mentioned in the Bible...
intentamos_de_nuevo t1_ist4wok wrote
Wtf are these comments. Are you all bots? This conversation makes no sense and has nothing to do with the first comment in the comment thread
[deleted] t1_isshx40 wrote
[deleted]
KurushSoter t1_isshl3u wrote
Did you know that things you haven’t heard of, can actually exist? Crazy, I know!
intentamos_de_nuevo t1_ist4pt3 wrote
Are you a bot? That makes no sense
KurushSoter t1_ist573c wrote
Are you a brain trauma victim?
intentamos_de_nuevo t1_ist7rfy wrote
Can you tell me what necromancy had to do with the first comment in this comment thread? And what theyre arguing against?
First comment:
>No it hasn't.
>You're talking to numbers that are following a formula in real time.
No mention of Christianity. No argument against necromancy.
Your reply:
> This is bizarrely similar to the Christian argument against necromancy
[deleted] t1_issedin wrote
[removed]
KurushSoter t1_issemb0 wrote
The Christian prohibition was based on the idea that you weren’t really talking to your loved ones, you could be talking to anything, including things that behave more or less automatically. Why are you so hostile?
Oh look. You’re just a dipshit stoner that knows nothing about religious history. Have fun.
[deleted] t1_issey63 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_issf7bl wrote
[removed]
Richey48 t1_issfnt2 wrote
You've taken quite a hostile intrest in this. Can't wait to see you reply to every comment about it on this thread to assert some pseudointelligence (like you already are LOL)
[deleted] t1_issfrf6 wrote
[removed]
Richey48 t1_issft5k wrote
What a life you must live
[deleted] t1_issfv2y wrote
[removed]
TripSackNKickBack t1_issmrrr wrote
The ignorant admittance of not having a life. Classic
Thai_Lord t1_isso2i1 wrote
I felt it more arrogant to explain my life than appropriate to say something as ignorant as that. Classic.
[deleted] t1_isso6oe wrote
[removed]
Thai_Lord t1_issoeaj wrote
You understand the hypocrisy of your statement?
You're talking to a troll on Reddit, you inept fuck.
[deleted] t1_issogrq wrote
[removed]
Thai_Lord t1_issoqq7 wrote
Lol. Try again at what? Hypocrisy for the sake of hypocrisy?
Enlighten me, please.
[deleted] t1_issouoc wrote
[removed]
Thai_Lord t1_issp9w7 wrote
"Average cop out after getting insulted on Reddit."
Cool, dude. Project much? I can tell you're trying real hard lol
What else you got? More nothings?
[deleted] t1_isspikf wrote
[removed]
Thai_Lord t1_isspmx5 wrote
That you're still responding? 😁
TripSackNKickBack t1_isspsp0 wrote
Sorry, do I need to explain what the “reply” button is for? Lol you really are that stupid, it’s kind of astounding.
Just more insults with little to no intelligence from you. I’ll be waiting, but it’s kinda sad that you have nothing smart to say and keep getting wrung out by a troll lmao
Thai_Lord t1_issq7am wrote
Yeah lol. You totally got me.
Do you feel better?
Thai_Lord t1_issqev8 wrote
Ahhhhh. I was like "why is this kid stuck at age 16."
You're a psychonaut kid.
TripSackNKickBack t1_issqje8 wrote
Ooooo and now you’re going through my profile because you have nothing better to say? That’s sad lmao 😭 REALLY tells me how much you lack in intelligence...
[deleted] t1_issqjrq wrote
[deleted]
KurushSoter t1_issiha9 wrote
Are you just big mad that you think I’m a Christian? Moms not making you go to church anymore little dude, you can let it go
[deleted] t1_istpbbt wrote
[removed]
KurushSoter t1_istpdmo wrote
If you can’t follow the conversation, you shouldn’t comment.
Unusualus t1_istu8cv wrote
You are not even on the topic jackass!
KurushSoter t1_istv33q wrote
If you can’t follow the conversation, you shouldn’t comment.
Unusualus t1_istwl04 wrote
>!You are not even on the topic jackass! !<
Turbulent-Macaron372 t1_issj3ux wrote
I love seeing someone get dogpiled over an innocuous comment, and I love it when someone is pressed on just slightly and starts talking like an anime villain. Solid thread guys 😁👍
silikus t1_issgwb5 wrote
"not talking to them, just random numbers" "Not talking to their former self" aka "not talking to the person you knew, but something new"
You can see the parallel here, yet you chose to be a hostile douche by calling them dumb and now are trying to claim moral high ground. Most likely because of some deep seeded disdain for the parallel
[deleted] t1_isshg4d wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_isshrzm wrote
[removed]
SteakHoagie666 t1_issjesz wrote
It's uh not. That's kinda the extreme fantasy version of it. Necromancy in religion can be seen as just speaking to the dead. Or 'divining' answers from the dead.
It's seen not a great idea because you could be talking to anything. Demon, yourself, another entity, or whatever.
I think the parallel they were drawing was simply the fact when you "talk to the dead" it's not really them or "may not be".
Enkundae t1_isspqm6 wrote
Eh. Get those numbers within a certain ballpark and the difference becomes more philosophical than anything. It’s pretty much the core of cybernetics, as in the actual scientific field rather than the colloquial pop-culture definition of the term.
Retlawst t1_isu39qg wrote
Shit becomes real once the heuristic mappings achieve 61.8% saturation
Thai_Lord t1_isspxat wrote
Jesus christ lolol
yuormomsgaydog t1_iswih2t wrote
The difference between him and a Reddit-tier tech chatbot is more philosophical than anything.
AJC_10_29 t1_isslssg wrote
I knew right away that headline was clickbait.
KungFuHamster t1_isskcrk wrote
It will be on the same level as the "art" produced by scanning thousands or millions of artworks, i.e. garbage.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments