Tbagjimmy t1_jbnx843 wrote
Don't want to diminish what the people who worked on this did but is editing newsclips with zero narration really a documentary?
noyoto t1_jbnzb25 wrote
I think it suffices. It'd be silly to disqualify it as it is now, but to consider it a documentary if a narrator mentioned some blatantly obvious things throughout the footage.
Granted they could have just called it 'news footage montage' and it'd be a clearer description (but less impressive).
Tbagjimmy t1_jbnzh6y wrote
True, they still are telling a story.
I guess I'm the one who is out of touch. 😞
ecodemo t1_jbolr6k wrote
You have to go watch Man with a Movie Camera.
Greatest documentary ever, described by its director as
>AN EXPERIMENTATION IN THE CINEMATIC COMMUNICATION Of visual phenomena WITHOUT THE USE OF INTERTITLES (a film without intertitles) WITHOUT THE HELP OF A SCENARIO (a film without a scenario) WITHOUT THE HELP OF THEATRE (a film without actors, without sets, etc.) This new experimentation work by Kino-Eye is directed towards the creation of an authentically international absolute language of cinema on the basis of its complete separation from the language of theatre and literature.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_with_a_Movie_Camera
Remastered on yt https://youtu.be/xTAlmWEjyr0
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments