Submitted by zweischeisse t3_11a0vx4 in ColumbiaMD
i_live_in_maryland t1_j9qzkeo wrote
Reply to comment by zweischeisse in The Library's perspective on the audit report by zweischeisse
> It seems like a lot of the problems in this situation could have been solved by the "investigators" who "staked out" the event attempting to actually enter the event rather than drawing conclusions from the parking lot. If they were turned away, it's not a public event and there is something worth investigating. If they were allowed in, the event is perfectly fine by library policy.
God yes, it seems like whoever was on this "stake out" was having some covert agent fantasy instead of just figure out what was going on.
BUT what is missing from the HCLS's report is any mention of the 4-hour early closing. (I read kinda fast, maybe I missed it.) My guess is this is actually a policy loophole, there's probably no policy that actually prohibits this. But it's so strange, I can't imagine the library agreeing to do that for other events.
zweischeisse OP t1_j9r57pt wrote
Actually the library said the early closure is the only concern of merit from the audit report and they plan on reviewing their policies on that topic.
i_live_in_maryland t1_j9rdf10 wrote
ok, thanks, I see it. It's a super brief mention for it being kind of the only thing they substantiated in the report. I think that's where the "they investigated themselves" is showing through. Anyone else doing an investigation would probably want to, like, draw attention to what they found.
BornFightingJS t1_j9r1r60 wrote
>> BUT what is missing from the HCLS's report is any mention of the 4-hour early closing. (I read kinda fast, maybe I missed it.) My guess is this is actually a policy loophole, there's probably no policy that actually prohibits this. But it's so strange, I can't imagine the library agreeing to do that for other events.
That is covered in the HCLS report.
catsinskirts t1_j9rlagp wrote
Is it? The only part I see addressing the early closure is this:
>In response to the inquiry regarding where HCLS staff went after the Central Branch closed at 2:00 p.m. on October 7, 2022, the committee believes this is a legitimate area for further review of HCLS policies, and recommends that the Board do so.* The committee was informed by staff that HCLS followed its standard practice for early branch closures in this instance, giving staff the option of working at another branch for the remaining hours of the day or expending accumulated leave for the remaining portion of the day. However, the committee recommends a review by the Board of whether the same policy should apply both to Library events such as Evening in the Stacks and sanctioned events by outside organizations. The committee has identified no costs incurred by HCLS for this event, other than ongoing fixed costs of operating the Central Branch building such as utility costs, etc., but recommends that the Board further review whether employee leave was granted that would not otherwise have been granted, had the outside organization event not been held.
*In light of this recommendation, the Board intends to examine current HCLS policies with regard to early closure of HCLS facilities for events, and determine whether any modification to these policies is needed.
It looks like they're saying that the policy around employee leave for early closures for outside events will be examined.
They're not addressing if the early closure itself is an issue. Which is a bit frustrating because that's the part of this I think actually affects the community. I don't care if there's an event in the library after hours, but closing 4 hours early means the people the Central branch serves were denied access to regular library services for the sake of this event.
Is closing early for outisde events something HCLS does? (I only know of them doing it for Evening in the Stacks, but that's the library's own fund raiser, not an outside event).
HCLS's report doesn't really answer that question. It says:
>In response to the inquiry regarding other partnership events or gatherings held at HCLS facilities after normal operating hours, and/or which caused early branch closures, HCLS staff has provided the committee with the list of such events that is attached hereto as Exhibit B
But Exhibit B, is actually just "a list of organizations that have had access to branches before regular opening times or after regular closing times," which doesn't tell us if the library closed early to accommodate these organizations.
Please let me know if there's something I'm missing, because I'd really like to understand this.
BornFightingJS t1_j9rmwni wrote
A key piece of information here is this: AKA was not just some “outside organization” having an event in a meeting room at the library because they needed a place to do it. Rather, AKA launched an exhibit in the Equity Resource Center the week of the event. This was considered a partnership event as a result, and the event was held in the Equity Resource Center.
The library can (and does) close early for its own events, as you noted.
catsinskirts t1_j9s14gg wrote
Thank you for clarifying that! The exhibit is important context.
I'm not sure if it being a partnership event means it's the same as closing for their fundraiser though. I can remember other partnership events (mostly HCPSS related) and other exhibits, but I don't recall the library closing early for any of them or intentionally closing early for anything other than the annual fundraiser.
BornFightingJS t1_j9tab1e wrote
The HCLS Board of Trustees is the governing body of the HCLS. They set and enforce the policies governing the operation of the library. They investigated the situation and found that this was within policy and not without precedent.
Respectfully, why is that not good enough?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments