Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

jeffbyrnes t1_iwg9ur2 wrote

Reply to comment by Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee in Cambridge City Council to consider citywide ban on ‘turning on red’ by superfakesuperfake

You can absolutely speak to the speed in Cambridge: the citywide speed limit is 25, but most roads are 20 MPH.

The whole point of my actions is to be safer. If there’s no bike lane, I need to take the main lane to be safe from being doored by drivers getting out of parked cars, which is a far greater risk than moving traffic behind me.

I’m also legally entitled to the entire lane.

Drivers speeding is a near-constant. So again: it doesn’t matter if I take the lane and am going 20 MPH myself, nobody driving should be conflicting with me b/c they shouldn’t be going faster than me.

Said another way: being directly in front of a car is the safest place I can be if there’s no bike lane. I’m at my most visible directly in front of a driver. If I’m to the side? Less visible, and in the door zone for parked cars.

It’s not a game of chicken when we’re all going the same direction.

You’re misunderstanding my point, which is that I can obey every law to a T, and I will endure drivers flagrantly breaking laws in ways that society has decided are completely acceptable.

So if we’ve all decided road laws are optional as a society, why am I being held to a higher standard as a cyclist, even though my behavior is far less risky than a driver?

2

jeffbyrnes t1_iwgcfeo wrote

Y’know, lemme ask this another way: would any of the behaviors I’ve described be acceptable if I were driving my car?

Would someone speeding around me, crossing the double yellow, b/c I was driving the speed limit, be acceptable, much less legal?

Would someone speeding at all, just because, be acceptable or legal?

Because that’s my issue here.

I obey far more moving vehicle laws than most drivers. I never speed (because I can’t! I can’t go that fast) and only rarely disobey a red light to cross when I deem it safer than waiting for cars to be allowed to move.

2

Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iwhet63 wrote

Hey, it's your life. I'm not a two ton object that needs to be convinced. I'm sometimes on a bike but not trying to get into a pissing contest with cars, as you seem to be. I yield and let them go. Why would you want to be an obstacle? Just sounds like you're making things unsafe for yourself to prove a point. That's not going to help much if you get hurt. Please stay safe. Your bike is an ancient technology with no safety features of any kind.

0

jeffbyrnes t1_iwhugnf wrote

Your entire argument was “cyclists should obey the law”.

So why do drivers get a pass?

2

Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iwi2w78 wrote

Who's giving them a pass? But if you think you're some kind of bicycle vigilante Batman who we need to enforce the law through daily conflict while straddling your 19th century contraption, I can assure you that this scenario is not something the public demands. Just give it a rest, man.

0

jeffbyrnes t1_iwixyb1 wrote

I mean, you’re giving them a pass.

You’ve been hot all over this set of comments, lambasting folks sharing that they break some laws in an attempt to be safer while cycling.

Saying “ugh scofflaw cyclists” while not even once acknowledging the reality of driver behavior as far worse is disingenuous.

Also, you keep referring to a bicycle as something antiquated & unsafe, which has its own negative connotations.

I’m hardly a vigilante; I ride a step-through & wear street clothes when I bike places.

Nobody, no matter how they get around, should be punish-passed or otherwise deal with abuse for going places, and yet this regularly happens to many. Hell, I’ve been punish-passed while driving a car.

2

Hyperbowleeeeeeeeeee t1_iwj21vz wrote

OK, I think you're speaking a slightly different language here with terms and accusations I don't really understand -- or I don't understand how they're pertinent. I think maybe it's gotten too unhinged to continue onward with this conversation really. Good luck with your bicycles.

0