Submitted by The_Food_Scientist t3_z8rs07 in worldnews
Comments
DIBE25 t1_iycwhra wrote
it's also supposed to be scanned in the postal system many times
something's missing.. delivered in person?
also the website is cancer
The_Food_Scientist OP t1_iycwszc wrote
I guess, happened two hours ago. The embassy is scheduled to make a press release. Who knows how it got through. There were no casualties and the man suffered the explosion got out in his own feet and was sent to the hospital.
Yoda--29 t1_iycx0cy wrote
Casualtiy means dead or wounded. So there was a casualty.
BKStephens t1_iyczum6 wrote
"One employee, who was handling a letter, was hurt in the blast according to Spanish Police.
He suffered light injuries went to hospital under his own steam, the force added."
The article never mentions a casualty.
Yoda--29 t1_iyczwy2 wrote
Still a casualty.
BKStephens t1_iyd0hjw wrote
Ah, I missed OP using it. My bad.
deletable666 t1_iyf23y2 wrote
Google what causality means.
*Casualty
VanquishedVoid t1_iyf34pr wrote
> Google what causality means
causality
noun
The principle of or relationship between cause and effect.A causal agency, force, or quality.That which constitutes a cause; the activity of causing; the character of an event as causing.
deletable666 t1_iyf3ajy wrote
Lol got me there
Excludos t1_iyf7dxp wrote
What is the meaning of this?!
BKStephens t1_iyf2ko1 wrote
casualty noun (INJURED)
a person injured or killed in a serious accident or war
Serious being the operative word here.
deletable666 t1_iyf332y wrote
Lmao. You are a trip dude. Doubling down instead of just admitting you were confused. Take care fellow. Bless your heart
BKStephens t1_iyf3ofv wrote
If you read the full thread you can quite clearly see where I admitted my confusion and what it was about.
It was not about what "casualty" means.
deletable666 t1_iyf3x8m wrote
Clearly you still have some confusion on what a casualty is, and there is no reason for me to read through all your other replies to other comments I am not involved in.
Take care, goodbye
BKStephens t1_iyf4qkb wrote
No confusion. I even Googled it like you advised, and put it right there for you to read.
Or is there no reason for you to read through all my replies? Even if they're directly to you?
wrosecrans t1_iyfc8rd wrote
In the phrase "serious accident" the adjective serious modifies the noun accident.
Are you saying somebody accidentally sent a letter bomb?
teaklog2 t1_iyfd6lv wrote
Going to jump in and argue the grammar here specifically, in an ‘or’ statement like that the ‘serious’ can also modify both things being listed.
‘i want to buy a red car or truck’ does not imply you want a red car or any colored truck
‘an accretive merger or acquisition’ - doesn’t imply you don’t care if the acquisition is accretive or not
unless you are saying if you want to say ‘I want to buy a red car, table, blanket, and shirt!’ you should instead say ‘i want to buy a red car, a red table, a red blanket, and a red shirt!’
if you want to remove that assumption from your sentence, you could instead say ‘a truck or a red car’ or ‘a red car or any colored truck.’
wrosecrans t1_iyfejq3 wrote
In that case, the reading is that a wartime casualty can only happen in a "serious war," and someone killed in a minor border conflict wouldn't count as a casualty. Is that a reasonable reading of the definition?
[deleted] t1_iydhbkz wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iydm7nf wrote
[deleted]
Additional_Share_551 t1_iyd4suq wrote
Modern use, casualty exclusively means dead. No one uses casualty to mean no longer fit for battle
Yoda--29 t1_iyd4wzk wrote
Look up the definition of casualty.
Purple-Quail3319 t1_iye40ed wrote
/r/confidentlyincorrect
coldblade2000 t1_iyd6pc0 wrote
> Modern use,
Not really, like at all. Casualties have always been people injured or killed, not just killed.
KrackasaurusRex t1_iyd5gba wrote
a : a military person lost through death, wounds, injury, sickness, internment, or capture or through being missing in action The army sustained heavy casualties.
b : a person or thing injured, lost, or destroyed : VICTIM the ex-senator was a casualty of the last election
From Merriam-Webster
Existing_Display1794 t1_iye9ms9 wrote
I was told there would be punch and pie here!?
KrackasaurusRex t1_iye9wm3 wrote
There isn’t any
GalacticCmdr t1_iyetjjj wrote
No cake?
Brian_Lafeve_Jr_ t1_iydeimg wrote
pluralcasualties
1
a
: a military person lost through death, wounds, injury, sickness, internment, or capture or through being missing in action
The army sustained heavy casualties.
b
: a person or thing injured, lost, or destroyed : VICTIM
the ex-senator was a casualty of the last election
2
: serious or fatal accident : DISASTER
losses from fire, storm, or other casualty J. S. Seidman
3
archaic : CHANCE, FORTUNE
losses that befall them by mere casualty Sir Walter Raleigh
Lucavii t1_iyeffkz wrote
What? Bruh, people die a lot less in the military now than in the past. It means both but we actually get MORE use of the word describing injured soldiers than killed ones
Teledildonic t1_iyehqiy wrote
>Modern use, casualty exclusively means dead.
UShouldntSayThat t1_iyel45v wrote
No one ever has used casualty to exclusively mean dead. If you've been listening to news reports that say 80k Russian casualties in the current war and assumed that meant how many are dead, you've been mistaken.
deletable666 t1_iyf29k2 wrote
That is exactly how it is used in the modern context actually. And same with older contexts.
teaklog2 t1_iyfdavu wrote
that is literally just untrue lol
[deleted] t1_iydr320 wrote
[deleted]
CrieDeCoeur t1_iydywu9 wrote
It’s almost like the words that make up languages are living things that evolve over time. /s
steven_yeeter t1_iydtfwc wrote
> One employee, who was handling a letter, was hurt in the blast according to Spanish Police.
Perhaps that was what this employee was doing?
Amauri14 t1_iyet8fk wrote
They probably send it personally there, just like when people send bomb packages, they just need to make it look like it went through the mail.
[deleted] t1_iycvzzf wrote
[removed]
Morbo2142 t1_iyd10zm wrote
The problem with stochastic terrorism and propaganda is how easy it is to lose control of the narative.
This was probably some Russian sympathizer who's brain has been turned to mush by Russian propaganda.
It sounds too amateur for an actual Russian gov operation. Not to mention it doesn't accomplish or further any of their current goals.
No idea why Spain of all places. Could be the history of fascism with Franco and all that. The soviets were heavily involved in that war.
KyloRen3 t1_iyd3zd6 wrote
Spain has a HUGE number of Russians living there, particularly around Alicante, Valencia, Málaga...
[deleted] t1_iydc27t wrote
[deleted]
AntiBox t1_iye0tk7 wrote
> It sounds too amateur for an actual Russian gov operation
It sounds exactly like their bungled Salisbury assassination attempt.
The_Food_Scientist OP t1_iyd1tbz wrote
You are quite spot on. The extreme left in Spain is full of Russia sympathisers. Mainly because the soviet union was the only country that offered real support in the Spanish civil war to fight off the fascist uprising and once the ww2 ended it was the main supporter of the Spanish communist party, the main opposition to Franco. Since then the Spanish left has moved away from communism but it was always tainted from a pro russian bias inherited from a pro soviet bias (like if Russia had anything in common with the soviet union). Now a days is something that only manifest in very niche ultra leftist groups. I remember a protest in support of the LPR and DPR in my city at the begging of the war with around 25 people in my city ( >150k habitats) but you just need one crazy asshole to make this kind of action.
druizzz t1_iydsih9 wrote
Lol, the only Russia sympathisers in Spain are from Vox, the party of the extreme right. Not long ago their were praising Putin for being the best politician in the world.
24offsuit t1_iydzlcm wrote
Untrue.
The far left AND far right are somewhat pro-Putin or anti-NATO and against support to Ukraine, albeit for totally different reasons. There is a crossover. It's kind of weird and on the fringe for both the left and the right but there is a small element on both sides.
ACCount82 t1_iyeqap4 wrote
And people still try to say that horseshoe theory is wrong.
1994mat t1_iyf5dns wrote
it's not horseshoe theory where theres this 2 far outer edges coming back together, it's one straight line with the far-left and far-right being super anti western establishment and wanting more populist brainrot
dymdymdymdym t1_iyf3nia wrote
It is, there are times where it makes some convenient mirages though.
bjornbamse t1_iyf4c1w wrote
Depends on what is understood as horseshoe theory. Both sides arrive at the same solution, but for very different reasons.
ACCount82 t1_iyf6zlf wrote
I don't think it's a stretch to say that many radicals are similar to each other - not in declared ideals, but in observable methods and behaviors. There's a point when this radical zeal and "anti-establishment" thinking overrides any other thought process.
Which is how radical right and radical left have managed to converge on hating NATO and sucking it up to Putin in many countries. As they did before on COVID restrictions, and long before that on trying to "cancel" media for wrongthink, and before that, and before that. Radicalization is enemy of thinking - which horseshoe theory illustrates.
[deleted] t1_iye7l0s wrote
[deleted]
24offsuit t1_iye91c4 wrote
I meant that, pro-Putin / anti-nato depending on political leaning. I'll edit my post to make it clearer.
goliathfasa t1_iyesr1v wrote
Pro-Russia sentiment
Far left 🤝 Far right
[deleted] t1_iydubif wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iye46pf wrote
[removed]
The_Food_Scientist OP t1_iydyipc wrote
True, but if you talk with militants of Izquierda Unida specially older ones you will find that they have kind of a soviet nostalgy and are very anti NATO
Murtellich t1_iye75o4 wrote
You can be both anti-NATO and anti-Putin. I'm a IU voter who sees NATO as a necessary evil and is anti-Putin.
kaisadilla_ t1_iye9x2k wrote
You are flat out misinforming people here. Almost nobody at any point in the left spectrum in Spain supports Russia. A few trolls on Twitter aren't representative of the "extreme left". Twitter is not real life. At most you can say that some elder far-left people don't support NATO and don't want to take sides in this war. But that doesn't mean they support Russia or Putin in any way.
xsairon t1_iyf310c wrote
idk what ur talking about ive never, ever seen or heard about a leftist that supports putin and what he's doing
there's plenty of communists, but putin supporters? only in the far right because he had the image of being a strong leader, hates lgbt stuff and the new "western" progressive wave, and that's about it.
Grunchlk t1_iydceuv wrote
>This was probably some Russian sympathizer who's brain has been turned to mush by Russian propaganda.
Sure but if it were an Iranian expatriate doing this to an Israeli embassy it would be widely regarded as a state sponsored terror attack and Iran itself would be culpable and subject to reprisals.
As it stands you're effectively painting it as "a passionate expatriate that got a little carried away." It's terrorism. Russia is executing a terrorist campaign in Russia and encouraging, either directly or indirectly, its expatriates to do the same.
Morbo2142 t1_iyde3z9 wrote
Stochastic terrorism is what you described. And I believe what I called it. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/stochastic-terrorism.
The government didn't carry out the attack but they encouraged and directed the behavior.
It's irresponsible to call an attack state sponsored unless there is proof the state had a direct involvement in planning and/doing the attack.
I don't disagree with you. It's hard to parse out what the Russian government is doing these days, what with all the reports of state approved warcrimes, terrorism, and gross human rights violations.
Also Iran isn't invading Isreal at the moment, so it would be a bit more of a surprise given all the happenings in Iran as of late.
[deleted] t1_iyds9g2 wrote
[deleted]
TheRC135 t1_iye0322 wrote
> It sounds too amateur for an actual Russian gov operation.
At this point I'd be tempted to argue the opposite. Have you seen their military?
cabbagehandLuke t1_iydxieb wrote
"He suffered light injuries and went to hospital under his own steam".
Love that wording haha!
Shiningtoaster t1_iycxwfy wrote
This is sick... Russia needs to be thrown out of Ukraine, asap.
The West should just give Ukraine weapons to hammer Russian cities far beyond the border to incentivize them to retreat
continuousQ t1_iydqfqi wrote
Not cities, bases. Destroy all their aircraft, ships and missile launch sites. Russia doesn't need incentives, they have plenty if that mattered. They need to lose their entire military.
TheFishFromUnderTheC t1_iyen00g wrote
Yeah, bombing cities makes a population resent the attacking force. Only bomb army bases and strategic points. The more you avoid the general populous, the better.
AllLovingVillian t1_iyf6lc2 wrote
Sherman ended the American Civil War by razing Georgia to the ground. Total war works, you have to commit fully.
djbtech t1_iyf9u04 wrote
Nukes ended the last "total war"
Care to double down on WWIII?
DrFunkenstyne t1_iyfa54m wrote
What may have worked then doesn't necessarily work now. The prevalence of cel phones and the resulting videos of war atrocities make it very hard to garner support for such acts. Just my 2 cents, I could be wrong.
[deleted] t1_iye03dy wrote
[removed]
Appropriate_Grade816 t1_iye2d28 wrote
Not just morally, but your plan to terrorbomb Russian cities is completely idiotic from a military-strategic perspective too. Attacks against civilians increase resolve, it does not lessen it. We are lucky people like you are not in charge of the Ukrainian military.
antibacterialsoap t1_iye7pjw wrote
It CAN increase resolve. I think it probably would for Russian civilians. But strategic bombing of cities can also completely break opposition. Russia succeeded this way against Syria with completely annihilating their cities. Those same commanders that got their experience in Syria are running the show now in Ukraine.
Appropriate_Grade816 t1_iyeend9 wrote
In Syria there were large amounts of troops capable of mounting campaigns on the ground, the Russians do not have that capability in Ukraine. Moreover, the Syrian conflict is still ongoing with rebels across the country.
antibacterialsoap t1_iyeqngi wrote
To be clear, I think it would be a bad move ethically and strategically to bomb Russian cities.
I just think sometimes in certain conflicts against certain opponents, this can yield the horrific results so desired by the people giving those orders.
Appropriate_Grade816 t1_iyeuk6v wrote
Yes, you are correct. Although quite seldom.
gotBanhammered t1_iye1jtg wrote
Hurting civilians is never the answer. By your logic Israel should start executing Palestinian civilians.
FapToMySkill t1_iye5pxt wrote
Wait they don't already?
gotBanhammered t1_iye804x wrote
Newsflash: More Russian soldiers died this year than all Palestinians... In all wars...
FapToMySkill t1_iyeml99 wrote
I'm sorry but who asked about that?
gotBanhammered t1_iyepu0k wrote
Putting into perspective the myth that Palestinians are being randomly executed/genocided.
FapToMySkill t1_iyett0f wrote
Myth? How much do you get paid? :D
​
Edit: found that you served in Iranian military. Explains the bias.
DonDove t1_iyd3cl6 wrote
Russia needs to be thrown everywhere. UN especially.
kingtz t1_iyes27m wrote
Additionally, the rest of the world needs to just sanction Russia back to the Stone Ages.
When Putin's generals and soldiers are starving and unable to get Western Medicine and other necessities, they'll be less likely to follow his immoral orders.
TheHollowJester t1_iyexep3 wrote
After this conflict ends, if we want peace r*ssia has to be dismantled. Treaty of Versailles scenario won't work as proven in the past.
Otherwise they'll recoup the losses, play nice for like 20 years and attack someone again, only this time do it better.
[deleted] t1_iydu9li wrote
[deleted]
shurimalonelybird t1_iydwpul wrote
No, it was clearly Ukraine bombing themselves
[deleted] t1_iye0ubx wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iyd0zt4 wrote
[removed]
Only_the_Tip t1_iyd2rrk wrote
Russia is responsible. Either directly or from the propaganda they shit out constantly on their Russian language broadcasts.
[deleted] t1_iydub5w wrote
[removed]
AleixASV t1_iydu5wb wrote
Biden... In Madrid? The US is not the world.
Donjuanisit t1_iyfan0f wrote
There was another bomb to a weapons company called Instalaza, from Zaragoza. Weapons sent to Ukraine by Spain were manufacured there. The newspaper is saying some type of grenade launcher.
The letters were made from cardboard and were posted for 2.70 euros. The staff member from the embassy got minor burns in a finger as a little flame started when she/henewspaper with youtube vid tried to open the letter but went to the hospital without ambulance help.
A second bomb was sent to the Instalaza main office building (HQ?). It was detected by security staff just before 19:00 and they phoned the police. An unit of TEDAX was sent to check it out and they detonated the bomb safely.
Both places were checked by the police in case other bombs werent located yet. It seems all good now. All evidences and fragments have been sent to the forensics. Blue ink was used and around 20 gr envelopes. Definetly they were not make by the unabomber. The whole thing is being taken as a terrorist attack.
As a personal note if more bombs were sent to other busineses and arrived at the same time frame (afternoon or afternoon delivery) they might be unopened till tomorrow. Not the best of the explosive devices but cheap to make.
godel32 t1_iyediq9 wrote
ruzzian terrorists can't even fight another army, need to resort to acts of terrorism. Shameful.
tap-rack-bang t1_iyejhbg wrote
I mean it could be any country that is responsible for this and probably not Russia /s
ThaFresh t1_iyf76hi wrote
Exploded by being overpacked with donation money
Unlawful-Justice t1_iyfbs7g wrote
Should have tipped them off when the return address was signed by V. Ladimirputin
[deleted] t1_iyepsax wrote
[removed]
000TheEntity000 t1_iyezwva wrote
Shittiest letter bomb ever, and where were any scans on post?
[deleted] t1_iyf9nq2 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iyfb7km wrote
[removed]
PSN_Exclusive t1_iyehnmy wrote
Hmm. Assuming this was Russia, or a Russian sympathizer, it could be due to the Spanish police assisting with war crime investigations in Ukraine. (Source - https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/training-center-spain-ukrainian-troops-start-operating-end-nov-pm-says-2022-11-21/)
Searched the comments and did not see this theory so just my contribution. Spain announced this assistance recently.
Conkuri t1_iyeysgr wrote
Surely this sub learned from Poland missile incident and won't jump to any assumptions until investigation finishes,right?
LickItAndSpreddit t1_iye0s7o wrote
In an alternate universe with dark humor Sesame Street, Super Grover is called to the aftermath of the embassy explosion and the whole alphabet is strewn across the rubble.
One_Day8686 t1_iydwhtm wrote
This article is very vague on what happened... Hmmm, is it not strange that the injured individual used steam to get to the hospital?
chumble182 t1_iyebkkz wrote
"..under their own steam" means that they didn't need assistance. It's a turn of phrase, not a literal description.
One_Day8686 t1_iyejc91 wrote
The practical take away here is still that of confusion. Why would such a situation garner such the unprofessional report?
WoodPear t1_iyfdzq6 wrote
The state of journalism nowadays
peterpeterpeterrr t1_iycvt6j wrote
Isn't mail supposed to go through x-ray systems before sorting in embassies?