Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

mccannr1 t1_j5k0rla wrote

This headline makes it sound like it's a disaster. The array is 98% deployed and working well within mission parameters. It's good to go.

400

danielravennest t1_j5k41gz wrote

The worry is since that array isn't latched, it may cause problems when they use the rocket engines.

84

shotsallover t1_j5l3wrs wrote

Or, maybe they use the engines to shake it loose so they can finish deploying it?

38

vanearthquake t1_j5l7vaf wrote

You’ve been watching lots of movies haven’t you

25

dboyr t1_j5le8vo wrote

It honestly sounds like a very reasonable attempt at a fix

32

alvinofdiaspar t1_j5llavl wrote

I don't know if they should even bother at this point - provided that the unlatched solar panel doesn't create any problems going forward. At some point trying to fix it might be more risky than leaving it alone.

7

Inariameme t1_j5mfgbo wrote

using the engines (i assume) is an inevitablity

deployment might be a closed process

without the capacity to reinitialize

3

GarunixReborn t1_j5mn9bv wrote

they could just retract it while the engines are operating, wouldn't that work?

1

alvinofdiaspar t1_j5mpeh0 wrote

Don't quote me on this because I don't know the details of the mechanism - but I don't think it is designed to be retracted; it's supposed to be one of these do once and done kind of design.

5

featherwolf t1_j5mldad wrote

It sounds like exactly the kind of maneuver JPL would pull.

3

alvinofdiaspar t1_j5ll0oo wrote

Believe it or not that's a thing - they tried that (among many, many other things) to try and deploy the high gain antenna on the Galileo probe. It all failed.

7

Chicken_Teeth t1_j5mxul9 wrote

We can send a tiny rocket loaded with WD-40 up there. Should need less force to launch less mass. Then just let off a little pressurized WD-40 from time to time to build speed in the vacuum. Or set up a planetary slingshot.

1

edstirling t1_j5kay40 wrote

"Nasa abandons hope of further deployment."

17

TecumsehSherman t1_j5l3bwa wrote

"Space program shuts down! 'We just couldn't deploy the dammed solar panels' says former Chief Space Person"

15

BLooDCRoW t1_j5l4pkb wrote

"NASA to declare bankruptcy after catastrophic deployment failure."

16

hobbitdude13 t1_j5l7ra7 wrote

"We just ployed them so hard we couldn't deploy them." - NASA spokesperson

12

amitym t1_j5lgpfa wrote

"What started as a monosaster has doubled into a disaster."

7

myusernameblabla t1_j5njyzo wrote

"NASA Slammed into Bankruptcy by Capitalist Critics as Efforts to Fully Deploy Lucy Solar Array Come to a Halt, Global Economic Meltdown Imminent and Housing Prices rise yet AGAIN!”

2

reckoner23 t1_j5qa1l7 wrote

I think its time to put a filter block on spacenews.com

1

mynameismy111 t1_j5jf67d wrote

the array appears stable and can generate sufficient power to carry out its mission. Credit: NASA/GSFC

52

PandaEven3982 t1_j5k0wfg wrote

And for the moment, that's all that matters. I'm sure the failure mode will be studied to a fare thee well, but the mission advances. Go Lucy!

12

therikan5 t1_j5oe8w6 wrote

Lots of fake scientists in these comments 🤣 most of them obviously didn’t pay attention in school

5

Greedy-Creme-995 t1_j5ijret wrote

More setbacks. This mission will never get done.

−136

mouse_puppy t1_j5iloaq wrote

Did you even read the article? I mean, I know this I'd Reddit but come on. It's 98% deployed, is not mission affecting, handled its earth flyby without issue, and is considered an acceptable level of risk.

92

SpartanJack17 t1_j5iqufj wrote

Are you confusing it with Psyche, a mission that's been delayed a couple of times? Lucy has already launched, one of the solar panels stopped deploying at 98%, and NASA decided that they don't need to go the rest of the way. It's not a setback.

42

mynameismy111 t1_j5jf6vc wrote

the array appears stable and can generate sufficient power to carry out its mission.

To be fair how often do we read the link instead of the headline

13