Submitted by DealCommercial348 t3_11b3ux3 in space
Comments
LucyEleanor t1_j9xdqly wrote
Juice? Psche?
mfb- t1_j9xhcxe wrote
[Psyche](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psyche_(spacecraft))
I agree with the top-level comment. In terms of crewed spaceflight: Polaris Dawn. First private EVA.
leoheck t1_j9y0qrk wrote
he just wants his juice to be delivered in the ISS as any other astronaut would like.
marriageisprison t1_j9wriel wrote
+1 for Psyche!
[deleted] t1_j9yz3e2 wrote
[removed]
Adeldor t1_j9vskyr wrote
Without question, for me it's Starship. If the concept ends up performing anywhere near expectation, this first launch will be a major step toward a revolution in orbital and deep space access, regardless of the flight's outcome.
DealCommercial348 OP t1_j9vsyg5 wrote
I live in Boca Chica, Tx so this is near and dear to my heart. So pumped to see it fly
Adeldor t1_j9vucpe wrote
DealCommercial348 OP t1_j9vvr5o wrote
This is sick!! SN15 OG
[deleted] t1_j9vw6g8 wrote
[removed]
Osiris32 t1_j9xk9hm wrote
Man, I am jealous. Getting that close to those behemoths. The best I've had was visiting Canaveral in 2007 and seeing the Shuttle on the pad from like 2 miles away. And even that was a red letter day.
x-ploretheinternet t1_j9xnhd4 wrote
You all jealous but I've never seen a rocket and don't live anywhere near a launch pad 😭 also: starship is definitely going to make me cry when it launches
[deleted] t1_j9y5fdg wrote
[removed]
LucyEleanor t1_j9xdsbz wrote
I'm in dfw. Where's the launch?
mfb- t1_j9xhnav wrote
At the southernmost end of the Texas coast, east of Brownsville.
The "when" is less clear. Maybe late March if we are lucky.
Adeldor t1_j9yh7qk wrote
Boca Chica, near Brownsville. Currently sometime in March, but that's surely fluid.
mrflippant t1_ja4voi9 wrote
Others have already responded that it's in Boca Chica; so I'll add that you can have a fantastic view of any Starship launch from South Padre Island.
dogeatcateatmouse t1_j9yf08e wrote
Estimate on departure?
TestCampaign t1_j9zjanh wrote
How is it looking out each day and seeing the build and launch site?
Mustang46L t1_j9vywlu wrote
Starship, because we get to see if it's gonna work or fail. It's important to know either way. Super excited if that damn thing lives up to the hype.
SwiftTime00 t1_j9w6i1n wrote
If you mean whether or not the first launch works or fails, 100%. If you mean the program as a whole, your way off, but I don’t think that’s what you’re saying.
[deleted] t1_j9whsjv wrote
[removed]
Paksti t1_j9vyrk8 wrote
Starship. I would absolutely love to see it launch.
[deleted] t1_ja0ui1f wrote
[removed]
jnemesh t1_j9wdwo7 wrote
Starship orbital test flight definitely, and hopefully followed by another flight with a successful landing of both the booster and the main ship!
niknok850 t1_j9wxu2z wrote
My DNA is finally going to the moon on a Vulcan rocket. Astrobiotic Moon Lander. It was delayed through Covid. I live in Florida and hopefully will have a chance to watch it lift off!
Orion2033 t1_j9z3irl wrote
Have you seen the roll-in? Why in the world they chose that ballerina paint job on such a great rocket no one can fathom. I was hoping for something tied a little more toward it’s mythological background. None the less Vulcan is my choice too
[deleted] t1_j9y3f1g wrote
[removed]
NotAHamsterAtAll t1_j9w644q wrote
Starship, nothing even comes close.
(But some of the new smaller reusable rockets are cool as well, so hope we will see some).
PersimmonSuperb t1_j9vubax wrote
As much as I’m over musk - starship just speaks of wonder and awe. Can’t wait. Would love Rocketlabs to get their next vehicle going but that isn’t as exciting.
[deleted] t1_j9wz4k6 wrote
[removed]
danielravennest t1_j9yifzi wrote
Gwynne Shotwell runs SpaceX day-to-day. Elon has too many other projects going on to pay much attention any more.
PersimmonSuperb t1_j9zsgdp wrote
Yes. I’m aware of that as is everyone else on this sub.
danielravennest t1_ja34szl wrote
Out of 22.8 million readers? I don't think so.
Merky600 t1_j9z0bsh wrote
Talk on the street is that there was a level of management that just kept Elon happy and distracted. He was the “Money Guy.” They even made a “Matrix” like wall display to show “science” on his floor keep him impressed.
how_tall_is_imhotep t1_j9zoxz0 wrote
"Talk on the street"? That's cute, but it's just something someone made up.
betterl8thannvr t1_j9xs61l wrote
Terran 1, I'm an avid 3d printing enthusiast so I just think it's cool as hell.
turtlechef t1_j9z2tl2 wrote
I think a Terran 1 success would be a great milestone for additively manufactured space hardware
Different-Growth1253 t1_j9vtlwd wrote
Intuitive Machines Nova-C lander launching on its way to the lunar surface. My favorite lander company, by far. Then in 2024, Astrobotic delivering VIPER to the south pole.
dont_remember_eatin t1_j9xkj3g wrote
Dreamchaser.
Not the most exciting, but hey, space plane! I was a huge fan of the shuttle orbiter, and while DC is way smaller, it'll be neat to see a cargo ship doing a runway landing again.
[deleted] t1_j9z2b8t wrote
[removed]
thaexistentialist t1_j9x7kpm wrote
This Butterstuff Indica I just picked up has me targeting the asteroid belt.
ootfifabear t1_j9y5aok wrote
It’s Northern lights, Cannabis indica. sigh, no. It’s marijuana
nuts4space65 t1_j9xnqcb wrote
I would like to see Relativity Terran1 and Firefly Alpha do well this year, but the obvious favourite for me is Starship.
CrunchyButtz t1_j9x1kbv wrote
Been waitin on that Minuteman III for a minute.
CaptBaron t1_j9xw7bl wrote
NG-19, as it will transport an cool instrument to the ISS, although i might be bit biased.
hamhead t1_j9ya7x3 wrote
Starship, I guess.
Because I have to sit here and grumble about there being no SLS/Artemis launch this year.
[deleted] t1_j9wi5a2 wrote
[deleted]
TransManNY t1_j9w4860 wrote
Space X Crew 7, scheduled for August 2023. The commander for the flight is Jasmine Moghbeli, it's her first flight. She will also be the first Irani-American in space.
Marvelous1967 t1_j9wvhlb wrote
Don't forget her...
[deleted] t1_j9xl6aw wrote
[removed]
A_Suspicious_Fart t1_j9whfd5 wrote
Starship, but I’m going to take the lazy route and say all of them. There is just so much to be excited for.
ootfifabear t1_j9y56pi wrote
JUICE . I can’t wait for the juice to be on the loose. I’m sorry I’m attached to a satellite that doesn’t even exist yet. But there’s just something about those lunchables, man
NikStalwart t1_j9wucf1 wrote
> Which space launch are you most excited for in 2023?
Whichever one delivers the first interesting payload. At the moment, that might be Psyche on Falcon Heavy, but things might change.
Don't get me wrong, the first launch of Starship will be inherently epic. However, I have a very pragmatic/utilitarian approach to space: I am less excited by the mere fact of a thing than I am by what that thing can accomplish. The first launch of Starship will provide data. The second launch of Starship might deploy Starlink satellites. But launch data is not immediately impactful for, available to or actionable by the average human. It will take from months to years for the data from the first Starship launch to touch the lives of John Doe or Ivan Petrovich. Deploying Starlink on Starship, while impactful, isn't inherently novel. More than half of SpaceX' 60 launches last year were Starlink payloads. SpaceX has also started deploying "Starlink v1.5" satellites due to the Starship delays. The mere fact of a Starlink v2 deployment from Starship is a good proof of conquest but not inherently revolutionary.
What would get me excited is a truly novel payload that capitalizes on the Starship promise. That promise, as I understand it, is to reduce $/kg to orbit. The direct implications of reducing launch costs are that:
- You can launch more missions;
- With greater frequency;
- With more capabilities; or
- With less complexity^1.
^1 in that, being less constrained for mass and volume, you can save money by not needing to miniaturise as much.
The first launch of Starship, or, for that matter, Vulcan and New Glenn, is a promise of things to come. But, to use JavaScript terminology, a promise that hasn't yet resolved. To be sure, it is historic, but you are still await
ing the result before you can use it.
I will be most excited for the first non-demonstrator, non-Starlink launch of Starship. Even if that launch is something like a $500k rover developed by some hitherto-unknown undergrad students from an engineering college in Nowhere County. I will be excited by that launch because the promise of Starship would have resolve
d.
NicTheCapsicum t1_j9xn5a8 wrote
The big boy Starship. If they can get that tin can going it will be a key big step forward.
Vindve t1_j9xxk90 wrote
Ariane 6 first flight, in Q4 2023. European space desesperately needs it, as Ariane 5 production has been stopped. Ariane 6 may not be the perfect rocket (yes I know it's not reusable), but it's a better Ariane 5. 50% cheaper and looking awesome. Currently there is a market for it, it will buy time for Europe to figure out what's next.
andygates2323 t1_j9yd4o1 wrote
Just to be different, I'm keen to see Boeing's Starliner finally complete it'ss crewed flight test in April and enter ISS service. More suppliers are better.
Tonderandrew t1_j9x6a6m wrote
Most likely the one right now the Soviets are sending up right now to rescue the stranded crew.
1infinitefruitloop t1_j9xlhcs wrote
Soviets? The whole Krikalev incident was like 30 years ago.
andygates2323 t1_j9ycvvp wrote
The ongoing drama is certainly an ongoing drama.
SoulReddit13 t1_j9xha03 wrote
Top 5
Juicey - mission to explore the icey moons of Jupiter.
Chandrayann-3 India’s lunar lander and rover
SLIM- jaxa’s first lunar lander.
Rocket labs Venus mission.
Xuntian (possibly launching?) The Chinese space station telescope. Same resolution as the Hubble but 350 times larger field of view.
Psyche the runner up.
Emble12 t1_j9xvcro wrote
I’ve been waiting for Starship OFT for… four years now? It’s crazy to think that’ll just be the beginning.
pikay93 t1_j9xfv3t wrote
Any evening launch. They are beautifully lit up by the sun and get a lot of people interested in this stuff, especially out here in LA where not many know about the space connections here.
Decronym t1_j9xvtvo wrote
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters| |-------|---------|---| |CST|(Boeing) Crew Space Transportation capsules| | |Central Standard Time (UTC-6)| |EVA|Extra-Vehicular Activity| |NG|New Glenn, two/three-stage orbital vehicle by Blue Origin| | |Natural Gas (as opposed to pure methane)| | |Northrop Grumman, aerospace manufacturer| |OFT|Orbital Flight Test| |SLS|Space Launch System heavy-lift|
|Jargon|Definition| |-------|---------|---| |Starliner|Boeing commercial crew capsule CST-100| |Starlink|SpaceX's world-wide satellite broadband constellation|
^(6 acronyms in this thread; )^(the most compressed thread commented on today)^( has 7 acronyms.)
^([Thread #8613 for this sub, first seen 25th Feb 2023, 10:20])
^[FAQ] ^([Full list]) ^[Contact] ^([Source code])
AVLPedalPunk t1_j9y8wvt wrote
Probably dehydrated ice cream. An old favorite but such a classic.
[deleted] t1_j9vr5p8 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9vrrj8 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9vz94k wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9vzuk9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9w250s wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wif2p wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wo5u0 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wrcng wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wrdns wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wt2v3 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wuf4d wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wvb9a wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wxmmr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9x0rup wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9x3aa8 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9x6f2b wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9x6vcy wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9xb6wd wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9xmfg9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9xr68n wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9xw69d wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9y1eeg wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9y5ycb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9yap55 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9yc8jb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9ykw82 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9yrnoe wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9ys4sc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9z0psi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9z2tah wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9z3t37 wrote
[removed]
gevans7 t1_j9z3ttm wrote
Are they flying around the moon this year or next?
[deleted] t1_j9z657x wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9z6eam wrote
[removed]
Chiefydawg1 t1_j9zdel2 wrote
Anyone have a brief synopsis of what's on the docket?
[deleted] t1_j9zfegl wrote
[removed]
pippinator1984 t1_ja0vdxl wrote
Anyone up for a trip to Boca Chica, tx. I would love to see the starship launch . Live near Dallas.
[deleted] t1_jab6uem wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wdwjc wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9wib5n wrote
[removed]
common_sensei t1_j9whsp8 wrote
Starship for sure, but I'm also hoping Blue Origin surprises us with a New Glenn launch this year. I doubt it will happen but it would be nice to see some competition in reusable launchers.
[deleted] t1_j9x4epp wrote
[deleted]
Cesum-Pec t1_j9zvzul wrote
LYNK Global is launching additional sats this year to enable a future where cell towers will be in space. Texting in some parts of the world will be active this year. As more sats fly, data and voice will begin. It will take 5000 small sats to go full data from any where on earth, but that is going to take a while.
Fufrasking t1_j9z0gp0 wrote
None. When i was a kid I was fascinated with the apollo program now, not so much. Same technology put on hold for 50 years and started up again. Fuck Musk, Bezos et al for their rockets. Nothing new just overly rich people playing with their toys with our money. Lets not pretend they are doing something new. Kamen invented booster landing tech 25 years ago. Remember the segway?
Rockets blasting into near earth orbit. Wow. Pinch me. And smaller and less powerful than the Saturn rockets of my youth. Wow.
andygates2323 t1_j9znqs6 wrote
> Kamen invented booster landing
Balancing ain't even half the problem.
[deleted] t1_jaag2gz wrote
[removed]
rhhkeely t1_j9ypdff wrote
Which ever one blasts an oligarch into the sun
andygates2323 t1_j9zn61t wrote
Sun-impact trajectories take a lot of propellant. Burn 'em up on re-entry instead!
alvinofdiaspar t1_j9vw93w wrote
Payload-wise probably JUICE or Psyche
Rocket - Super Heavy-Starship