Submitted by LurkersWillLurk t3_zzz06n in philadelphia
Comments
salazarbacone t1_j2fgc0l wrote
Well said. It's frustrating because owning a car is so expensive and having an amazing public transit system would help to lift people out of poverty, which councilpeople claim to care about
CreditBuilding205 t1_j2etge2 wrote
Because most of the city government wouldn’t be caught dead on public transit.
Hell, I think a large portion of the city government would prefer to live in the suburbs and spend as little time in the city as possible.
LurkersWillLurk OP t1_j2eeths wrote
The screenshot from Kenyatta Johnson complaining about PPA ticketing cars illegally parked on the median perfectly encapsulates city government’s opinions about public transit
LFKhael t1_j2eezrg wrote
> Councilmembers have been known to drastically rezone entire commercial corridors due to parking complaints, but when it comes to the well-known woes of the city’s transit system, they are typically silent. If an illegally parked car blocks dozens of Philadelphians on a bus or trolley from getting to work on time, Council is more likely to intervene to help the scofflaw avoid tickets than it is to help transit riders get where they need to go.
courageous_liquid t1_j2f05o5 wrote
That's hilarious. Chicks median parking at one point was 100% comprised of cars from washington township. So we're prioritizing people in a different STATE over local residents.
0716718227 t1_j2emrpz wrote
Council continues to stand in the way of Philly ever getting back to where it once stood
Level-Adventurous t1_j2f3qb4 wrote
“I’m just concerned about the density, and I’m really concerned about the parking,” Council President Darrell Clarke said Tuesday morning, addressing Planning Commission director Gary Jastrzab during budget hearings. “It’s a real issue. Everybody’s not going to ride the train, everybody’s not going to take public transit. This is Philadelphia. People drive to the corner store. This is what we do.”
This is how they think and I agree with you it’s frustrating.
notnobodyspecial t1_j2f4fi3 wrote
Clarke's not wrong about the behavior, but it's councils job to have vision and move the city forward not just acquiesce. Definitely frustrating.
[deleted] t1_j2fh2j0 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2f7rw5 wrote
[removed]
uptown_gargoyle t1_j2enmr9 wrote
i can barely stand it
toxicfemme666 t1_j2f9bav wrote
Somebody really needs to take a stand
economist_ t1_j2evppq wrote
Until they ticket and tow cars parked in bike and bus lanes everywhere, city council should not put the words environment and climate change in their fucking mouth.
CockercombeTuff t1_j2fm44r wrote
I saw several cars double parked and off/empty (so presumably parked overnight) along Aramingo at 5:30am this morning. Parts of the street were basically one lane. Not usually up and out at that time so it was surprising.
Fattom23 t1_j2eiot4 wrote
Are median parkers now just Kenyatta Johnson's entire constituency?
JesusOfBeer t1_j2enqto wrote
Pretty sure he was a key reason Washington Ave “redesign” was absolutely* fucked west of broad…
PurpleWhiteOut t1_j2f5f8f wrote
He was the only reason, yes
a-german-muffin t1_j2ejafr wrote
Always were.
hockeystuff77 t1_j2elvg2 wrote
🌎👩🚀🔫👩🚀
Ng3me t1_j2ei1rt wrote
The article is completely correct. Excellent job Inquirer.
TreeMac12 t1_j2ellyh wrote
Yet they will still endorse every single council member for re-election and one of them for mayor.
Ng3me t1_j2enpi6 wrote
Can only endorse who’s running.
uptown_gargoyle t1_j2fah2j wrote
Always possible to withhold endorsement
lordredsnake t1_j2f0ijf wrote
Wow. This editorial's dismissal of the concerns from Roxborough and Manayunk over the Bus Revolution is completely out of touch. Hundreds of mostly senior and working class people showed up at the last community meeting with SEPTA. The venue was at capacity so people stood out in the rain and waited for a second presentation. The plan eliminates a heavily used route (the 27) and forces all of those seniors to walk up to Ridge Ave. to catch the 9 in the hilliest part of the city. Then all those seniors have to transfer at 30th St. to either another bus line or the trolley to get to Center City, where many of the stations still are not ADA compliant.
Curtis Jones is absolutely right with his criticism. Nobody who takes that bus line could have thought that was a reasonable change to the service. I'd love to hear the geniuses on the editorial board explain their statement that all these riders would benefit. The SEPTA planners couldn't seem to make a convincing argument through several hours of community meetings.
Brunt-FCA-285 t1_j2f59fj wrote
I’ve been supportive of the overall route changes proposed as part of the Bus Revolution, but the Manayunk/Roxborough changes have left me scratching my head. I can’t help but think that tech consultants that they hired to design the new bus system never actually set foot in that neighborhood; otherwise, they would have seen that the changes might look good on paper but fall flat in the face of the reality of walking up a hill. I just hope that the SEPTA representatives agree and didn’t say anything committal at those meetings because they didn’t want to push their consultants under the bus.
They had better change it, though, because otherwise, what will happen is NBC 10, Fox29, 6ABC, KYW, and the Inquirer will all run stories about the people who can’t reach the bus in Manayunk and Roxborough. This will completely undermine any other successes that SEPTA may experience with their bus network reconfiguration.
randompittuser t1_j2fmz5r wrote
This city is one of the most corrupt in politics, and has been for a long time. Wouldn’t expect them to care about anything but the bribe money.
HoagiesDad t1_j2fj484 wrote
Is council offering any views on heroin addicts living on the El or the stairwell at the Allegheny station being taken over by dealers. It’s gotten so bad I’m back to driving.
Suitable-Cattle-9348 t1_j2fpamp wrote
The only reason those Council members are more worried about cars is because they don't have the balls to ride public transit.
jpstanton93 t1_j2euut7 wrote
Though I agree city council and OTIS and the Streets Department can all be doing better with regards to upgrading and improving public transit, this op-ed never really gets to a point. It focuses heavily on Bus Revolution and some forthcoming city council hearings where SEPTA will present its findings and proposed route changes. Nothing will get torpedoed at these hearings, as city council has very little say in how many busses SEPTA throws at any given line and where routing goes.
Where city council and the rest of the administration does need to step up is traffic enforcement. The traffic officer unit approved by ballot referendum in 2019 is still not operational (although I think these positions are finally posted requisitions on the city's website). And although it didn't directly impact SEPTA operations, the whole kerfuffle over Washington Ave did ultimately remove dedicated bus stop platforms, which doesn't bode well for future infrastructure improvements for any sort of transport within city limits.
Fattom23 t1_j2ex5zx wrote
Allowing motorists to do whatever they want without consequence is the ultimate preference given to drivers.
donttouchthirdrail t1_j2ewazk wrote
The city gives very little money to septa and only has two seats on the board, which means they don't have the ability to council it up like they normally do.
Unfortunately this is also reflected in septa's capital and operating budget, so we kind of get screwed anyway.
[deleted] t1_j2exjue wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j2f92lf wrote
[removed]
Scumandvillany t1_j2euuso wrote
It's pathetic and telling that although council claims to support and protect the "community", which is ostensibly minority communities and poor communities, even though these communities utilize public transit, especially buses and the el/sub more than ANY other demographic, when it comes down to it, they really listen to people wealthy enough to have cars and loud enough to show up at community meetings and/or email their Councilpersons.
NO ONE on council challenges the auto first narrative this city has pushed for nigh on 70 years, a narrative that has contributed to much destruction of architecture, history, and critical transit infrastructure(mostly by neglect). The one project that was transformative(the connector project) mainly benefited relatively more wealthy suburban commuters. Every single one of them is a pussy who claims they're concerned about climate change, and want to promote a walkable, transit connected city, but most of what they actually do promotes the opposite.
It's very frustrating.