Submitted by findingnemo202020 t3_yg68q9 in personalfinance
Long time lurker, first time poster.
My husband and I are 28 and 29, respectively. No kids yet, but we want one. He makes 73k/year, I make 37k/year. When accounting for the MFJ tax deduction and other pretax deductions, we are squarely in the 12% tax bracket.
I max out our Roth IRAs yearly. We also contribute 22% of my husband's pretax income to his 401(k)/457(b).
We should be focusing on the Roth contributions because we make (relatively) less money, right? If we were in a higher tax bracket, we should pay more attention to pretax deductions?
This has been a great sub to scour. It has taught me a ton!
micha8st t1_iu75l0k wrote
I don't think it's that obvious.
First of all, I'm old. Roth wasn't even invented until I'd been contributing to my 401k for 10 years. Then it took another 14 years before my employer decided to add Roth to my 401k.
73 + 37 = 110. 22%(73k) + 12k = 22,060. That's 20% of your combined income. General recommendation is 10-15%. 20% is steep, unless you're behind.
Fidelity recommends having 1x your (combined) salary saved for retirement by age 30. How close is your combined retirement account value to 110k?
I'm old, but not quite old enough to withdraw from my retirement accounts. Wifey is younger than me. So if I were to quit at 59 1/2, at least 3/4 of my retirement money will be in Traditional, only 1/4 in Roth. But.
For those years between retiring and RMDs, I can spend out of my Roth, and convert Traditional to Roth. That will lower my tax rate, allowing me to get money into Roth.
There are 2 good reasons to go Traditional, in my opinion:
Don't think Congress can't ruin your plans? My parents-in-law planned to take money out of my FIL's workplace retirement account to pay for college. Before the eldest daughter graduated HS, Congress changed the rules and those withdrawals were no longer permitted. So I married a girl with Student Loans.