Comments
DrunkenOlympian t1_jar05pd wrote
Meanwhile the people responsible for the opioid crisis killed hundreds of thousands of people and didn't even have to admit wrongdoing, they just paid a fine. This country is fuuuuuucked up.
Proof-Brother1506 t1_jar3xmo wrote
DO NOT COMMIT FINANCIAL CRIMES IF YOU ARE POOR.
If rich: See other rules on the reverse side of the page.
jimmymd77 t1_jatmw19 wrote
Other side of the page: we will fine you 40% if we catch you, you keep the other 60%, or 100% if we don't catch you.
shastadakota t1_javajm0 wrote
So, the aunt that she victimized is rich ?
series_hybrid t1_jasepfh wrote
Plus, the "fine" they paid was only a small percentage of their profits.
I emember a quote about "if the punishment for a crime is a fine, then it is only a punishment for the poor"
dkdndkdmdmdmd t1_jb8my8z wrote
How are pharmaceutical companies responsible for the opioid crisis? Do they forcibly make people ingest opioids? The people who abuse opioids are responsible for the opioid crisis. It just easier to blame some faceless big evil corporation.
I had back surgery and nerve damage that caused excruciating pain recently and was prescribed opioids and I am not addicted in the slightest.
SelfDestrekt t1_jaryl7l wrote
> Travis also said that while $18 million is a lofty number, it is not the official bond set by a judge. Prior to a bond hearing, crimes have preset bond figures and the preset bond for each one of her counts is $25,000. The $18 million number is a cumulative total amount based on the preset figure set for the over 800 counts she faces.
The number is insane, but it would be completely different if a judge had given this instead. Most likely it will be heavily reduced.
bdd6911 t1_jasu3f5 wrote
If it isn’t reduced to something way way way lower this should be reposted at top of not the onion, and late stage capitalism, and probably a few others. Ridiculous.
monogreenforthewin t1_jar0hdb wrote
so wait a minute stolen credit card for takeout results in a bigger bond requirement than people who tried to overthrow the government?
PasTypique t1_jasfpkc wrote
Guess what happens if you're suspected of selling **gasp** cigarettes on the street.
RobsEvilTwin t1_jauvvof wrote
Summary execution mate. Also for allegedly passing a bad 20.
shastadakota t1_javaohq wrote
Just single cigarettes. Packs of twenty are OK.
myusernamehere1 t1_jatur7s wrote
Wacky tobacky or cancer sticks?
islandlalala t1_jau2d5x wrote
I say you, you daid.
RobsEvilTwin t1_jauvsvo wrote
Well the seditionists were white, so.
Baidarka64 t1_jaqzafk wrote
So…basically she is responsible for the DD service fees.
tee142002 t1_jas9amc wrote
Bunch of fuckers in here didn't even read the article. It literally says the following:
>Travis also said that while $18 million is a lofty number, it is not the official bond set by a judge. Prior to a bond hearing, crimes have preset bond figures and the preset bond for each one of her counts is $25,000. The $18 million number is a cumulative total amount based on the preset figure set for the over 800 counts she faces.
Once she has an actual bond hearing, it'll probably be a few thousand
GetlostMaps t1_jasw9gh wrote
Per-offence bonding is a human rights violation, as in a modern justice system the bond is related to the characteristics of the offender not the offence. Pro tip: mandatory minimum sentences are also internationally condemned as a violation of human rights. The US is a major offender against human rights every single day.
dkdndkdmdmdmd t1_jb8mnt5 wrote
Internationally condemned? Funny, the US legal system isn’t bound by international opinion.
[deleted] t1_jb8pq4f wrote
[deleted]
bubba7557 t1_jarmg02 wrote
Seems excessive considering her theft was for 12k, done at an average of 89 bucks a pop. If she's stealing less than 100 dollars at a time I'm guessing a 100 dollar bail would have been just as effective as 18 million.
jordantask t1_jasktzz wrote
It’s not excessive.
She was charged with almost 800 counts. Each count has an arbitrary bond of $25k. If you add up the total amount of bond for each count you end up with $18 million.
When she has an actual bond hearing the judge will probably overturn the arbitrary bond number and award something more reasonable.
jamesgelliott t1_jarbxqe wrote
Her crimes go beyond just felony theft. Because of the age of the aunt they will include exploitation of the elderly or infirmed. And it's highly likely it wasn't her first offense
Psychomadeye t1_jasnad5 wrote
And why not just throw in some cyber crimes cause she used her phone too.
jamesgelliott t1_jat2t4r wrote
Maybe the DA has or will. She's certainly not a good person
Psychomadeye t1_jatcq0w wrote
Eh I reserve judgement until the 137th offense. Though to be entirely fair, it's excessive bail due to the fact that there's 136 individual counts stacked on top of each other. A judge should probably schedule that bail hearing soon to avoid a civil suit. Good person or not they deserve civil rights.
jamesgelliott t1_jatg62g wrote
Yes, I agree it's excessive.
ZS88 t1_jarendh wrote
So 12k worth of fraudulent charges equals a $18 million bond? Makes sense
/s
eighty2angelfan t1_jart1qj wrote
San Bernardino man convicted of violent armed assaults released pending sentencing, murders police officer. We should have charged him for stealing lunch, he would have stayed in jail.
tabovilla t1_jaqy6zi wrote
daamn, what was she doordashing? realstate?
malkavich t1_jar5suf wrote
All the while January 6th terrorists get less.
jamesgelliott t1_jarc2lv wrote
Different jurisdictions. Louisiana must take crime far more seriously than DC or the federal government. But her crime is more than just felony theft. Charges will include financial exploitation of the elderly or infirmed because of the age of the aunt. And I'm just guessing but this probably isn't her first offense.
CaveatRumptor t1_jar7j5b wrote
The aunt probably felt very betrayed and violated.
Pathetian t1_jarfnxj wrote
I've never heard of anyone getting bond that high. Maybe like 2-5m for murder, bur past that they just deny bond right?
Must be an automatic amount for each charge or denying bond completely isn't allowed.
jordantask t1_jasl0ux wrote
This is an arbitrary number set by statute for bond, which a judge could overturn when she has an actual bond hearing.
When she gets a bond hearing it’s probably not gonna be 18 million.
12baakets t1_jarhfo7 wrote
ChatGPT is still in beta bros
bubba7557 t1_jarmn3y wrote
JudgeGPT
Straitoutahelgen t1_jaufm4v wrote
Mug shot looks like they told her what her bond was gonna be right before they snapped the picture.
charface1 t1_jar2t6u wrote
She only ordered from Frog Ross’s Foie Grasturant.
Infernalism t1_jar0r05 wrote
Fucking Louisiana, Texas' stupid next door neighbor.
I'm so fucking glad I moved out of the South. Fucking morons, all of them.
blindwit t1_jaqvx26 wrote
18 million? So half the total of all those orders?