Submitted by goodmorninga t3_127c550 in books

Just as the title says, here are my criticisms. Please humble me and point out where I may have let my bias get in the way of actual understanding. I love this book. I hate how it made me feel. I feel heartbroken by it.

​

tldr: the ending was callous to me. Why is tom seen as some god? why did they do Jim like this?

my criticism:

Huck starts out as a naïve boy, following the whims of his friend, Tom. Huck went along with all of his crazy plans, just like in Adventures of Tom Sawyer. However, when Huck escapes civilization, and is accompanied by Jim, Huck begins to listen to the inner voice of himself, doing what he knows in his heart to do. Huck defied the ideology of his civilization and their notion that black people are below them. While on their adventures, Huck begins to transform into a more self-confident young man who learned to make tough moral decisions for himself and for Jim. The story flowed by the middle of the book, and was beautifully constructed and set up in the beginning, to make this story a revolutionary vision of freedom of thought for Huck Finn. Huck finn was a relatable character, while being white, he had an alcoholic father and was never really able to find his footing or place in the world before he escaped. That all changed along his journey, as we began to see Huck change, through his experiences, and heart-to-hearts with Jim. Jim was a beautiful depiction of what a beautiful soul looks like. Mark Twain’s humor is sadistic. I believe he wants us to think of him as “special” or “cool” for fooling us in the way he did, and for us to not take much seriously by the end of the book. I say this because all of Huck’s character development was thrown out the window once Huck reunited with Tom, and once again became Tom’s submissive shadow. Tom’s second appearance in the novel could have been permitted if Huck had learned something from his journey, and Huck could have stood up for himself and said “Tom this is a ridiculous, Jim’s life is at stake.” but he never once stood up for Jim and Huck continued to be the boy-disciple of Tom. Even at the beginning of the novel, I always found Tom Sawyer to be a one-note pony, his ideas weren’t even creative, they were just derivatives of Tom’s child-hood story books. Tom, even though he is depicted as 12 years old in the book, he was a depiction of a future sadistic, narcisistic sociopath who does not give a damn about Jim’s life, and believes anyone who stays from his notions are lesser-than and he will look at them with disgust. Huck even said in the book that Tom was the best “Superintendent,” and going by this as well, it makes Tom out to be an embodiment of a extremist government entity who inflicts pain on others and baffling principles for his own entertainment. I think even on paper, that doing this ending of the book was a horrible move on Mark Twain’s part. What happened to Jim’s daughter? Why was the ending “clarification” crammed in the last chapter? Why was everyone all willy-nilly that “oh Jim’s free! But still a slave! Oh, but Hes free guys and oh we learned nothing!” I hate how pretentiouly the name of the last chapter is written, “Oh we are gonna sound important by using roman numerals for all the chapters, but the last chapter will be CHAPTER THE LAST; Nothing More to Write.” like c’mon, This has got to be some kind of sick joke on the readers. I was so frustrated reading the final chapters which were drawn-out (an understatement) with the stupid failed plan of Toms, I wanted to skip them but I kept reading only because of Jim. I am disappointed in this book, but I am most disappointed in Huck, for not applying anything of what he had learned on his endeavor. I’m not disappointed in Tom though, because I’m not going to reason or debate with an obnoxious child who is a spoiled and entitled person. I hope Jim is okay. I feel horrible for him, for being treated like this only because he was born. I wish Mark Twain gave him a better ending. If I were to read this book again, I would only read up to the part until stupid Tom comes back in. Very bad taste in my mouth after this one, but if there is a main message it would be that, do not waste your time entertaining a crazy person’s ideas and follow your own moral compass on what you think is right.

I loved Huck Finn though. I loved this book. I didn’t mind the dialects, once you got into it the dialect became just a different slice of life that you understood. Jim’s dialect and quotes were very endearing to me, I adored the character of Jim, and rooted for him throughout the book. Some parts moved me to tears. This book was so well written, and that’s where my devastation came from by the end of it. Until I was halfway through the book, I thought Huck Finn was black. I must not have noticed where they said he was white until the book hinted at it in the middle, and I was confused for the next few chapters, and I chuckled because everyone else already knew and I just found out. Maybe a language barrier thing with the dialect that I didn’t pick up on till I was invested in the book. It was amazing to watch the transformation and growth of Huck. The rafts symbolism was very interesting and it being a travelling safe haven for the adventures of Huck and Jim was such a cool concept. The book didn’t try to be something it wasn’t, it was funny, bitter-sweet, and heart-breaking. I disagree with others who say this book is racist, it is quite the opposite. While I’m mad at Mark Twain, I can understand that he didn’t want Tom Sawyer’s actions to be well-received by readers, and it makes a statement that I can’t articulate at this late hour. All that I can say though is that this book is beautiful.

0

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Beyond_Reason09 t1_jeeb8gv wrote

You lost me when you complained about it using Roman numerals for chapter numbering. What are you, 10 years old?

15

goodmorninga OP t1_jeez9sy wrote

looking back now, it was pedantic of me. to be fair though it was pretty late when i was writing this and I was heightened. my bad.

0

jhnadler t1_jefdih8 wrote

It's important to remember the time and conditions of the period when this was written. Your opinion of the characters is not wrong. Tom Sawyer represents civilization and society. When Huck and Jim are around him, they have to conform to expectations and fulfill the roles society expects of them. It's only as they're in the "wilderness" that they become free to be themselves. Clemens is speaking to that duality and reminding us that we sometimes see people not as they are but as society makes them out to be. Jim may be free, but society enslaves him in a different way.

13

PansyOHara t1_jefkp5r wrote

Just a few thoughts from one who has read and reread this book many times (although not recently). Not saying my ideas are right or better than anyone else’s.

Jim and Huck both belong to groups perceived as “less than” in the society of their day (and Twain’s day): Jim an enslaved person and Huck a poor white who was homeless and (believed to be) an orphan in Twain’s previous book, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. In spite of Huck’s poverty and low status, he was envied by Tom, a slightly younger boy who had a big imagination fired by popular adventure literature of the day. All of the other boys followed the lead of Tom, although we have no real reason to think he was actually smarter—but he had some charisma, whether or not it appeals to readers today.

Tom was also an orphan, but he lived with his aunt and 2 cousins, and had a much more secure life, which in his mind was boring.

Tom and Huck were rewarded with a large sum of money for what they did in “Tom Sawyer.” This motivated the Widow Douglas to adopt Huck and take him into her home to try to “civilize” him. Huck at this time was probably about 14. Huck found it a strain to have to conform to the activities and expectations of civilization such as wearing shoes, staying clean, learning to read, etc. the Widow’s sister, Miss Watson, is a constant thorn in his side. Huck is well-acquainted with Jim, who is Miss Watson’s slave.

Huck’s alcoholic, abusive father, believed to be dead, shows up and claims his son because he has found out Huck has money. Huck sees that the only way to escape his father is to fake his death and take off. When he encounters Jim, who has decided to make a move to a free state, the two decide to team up.

They have somehow ended up going south instead of north when they finally end up in Arkansas at the home of Tom Sawyer’s aunt and uncle, who are expecting Tom for a visit (wonder why Aunt Polly must have thrown up her hands and sent him away!). Huck pretends to be Tom.

Naturally, when Tom arrives, his romantic imagination instantly fixes on the adventure of the imprisoned man wasting away like the Count of Monte Cristo and his other literary idols. All of the dramatic play-acting he convinces Huck and Jim to go along with doesn’t really make sense, except in Tom’s mind. Huck actually thinks it’s all crazy—but he goes along and follows Tom, the ringleader of adventure. He’s not the first person to leave common sense behind and follow a charismatic leader. Poor Jim endures because he has no choice.

Finally the truth comes out when Tom >!breaks his leg!< and it’s learned that Miss Watson had already granted Jim his freedom. So all of Jim’s suffering while locked up was needless—and at any time, Tom could have revealed the truth. Tom isn’t painted very positively in this, although it doesn’t seem that Huck is as critical as he might have been!

Huck ruminates on the whole episode in the final chapter. He has grown a lot in understanding and maturity but he hasn’t fully grasped the meaning and consequences of what he has learned. And while he has escaped the Wisow Douglas and her civilizing efforts, it looks like Aunt Sally may be taking the Widow’s place…

I think in some ways this is the story of society: the tendency to follow a charismatic leader, even when some of their ideas are questionable at best; our ability to classify others into stereotypes when we don’t know them; the divisions that exist in society even when people interact on a daily basis; the rights of parents/ employers/ owners (in that time, but remember slavery has existed on various forms as long as “civilization” has existed) vs the rights of children or slaves; looking at every situation from a legalistic perspective—and in Huck’s case, the fact that life and learning isn’t a clear and straight progression but has many barriers, detours, and even regressions on the way. One can’t only move forward according to one’s own code, but is influenced by others for better or worse.

Twain doesn’t really convey a super clear message in the book, I will agree. But I do think he has released some ideas that a reader can meditate on. That’s better, in my mind, than directly telling the reader what to think.

I have found that each time I read it, I have new questions in my mind and new thoughts to process. IMO, that’s a sign of a good book.

7

Boney__Danza t1_jedomm6 wrote

It's an important book to read for cultural literacy reasons, but it doesn't hold up all that well. I enjoy old books and movies, but most don't actually hold up well if you are expecting a similar experience to consuming contemporary media.

6

twenty-six-sixty-six t1_jee88h7 wrote

>If I were to read this book again, I would only read up to the part until stupid Tom comes back in.

you're in good company, it's often been pointed out that the ending of the book is a cop-out

it's still a great book though

6

rj_snow_tx t1_jeenyzy wrote

Your essay is a bit like the book. Starts out with a direct indication that you feel betrayed by the book and finished with how much you love the book. It has me confused if you feel betrayed or are entangled with some love hate relationship with it.

I guess it all is a metaphor for real life where there are no perfect wrap ups. Despite our best efforts and convictions true resolution often never happens.

6

goodmorninga OP t1_jeewgr7 wrote

To clarify yes, it is a love hate relationship. I felt betrayed by the end of the book. I felt like we all got trolled. I feel like Twain brough Tom back just be cause he was so well liked. I saw Tom though as a shallow kid who doesnt know yet what living in the real world is like.

and I guess so, thats a good metaphor. Cool connection you made by the way.

1

stavis23 t1_jef7lze wrote

It’s not perfect but you gotta love Huck Finn for what it is. Mark Twain is simply a beautiful writer. Have you read Pudd’n’head Wilson? It’s brilliant, I think

2

goodmorninga OP t1_jef7xxo wrote

no, I haven't. Worth a read? Is it sad? I googled it, and I'm thinking I'll check it out.

0

stavis23 t1_jefle8j wrote

It’s funny- dark, absurd kind of humor and lovely, lilting prose of Twain. AND I really love the ending.

2

Fizban1980 t1_jedrpty wrote

I remember learning that the author took a big break in the middle of writting it. Like he didn't know where it was going or what to do. This could just be, I need to finish this type of ending.

1

chocoboat t1_jeexh7h wrote

I hadn't heard that before, and it explains a lot. Apparently Twain planned for the story to be about Huck Finn's development into an adult.

He worked on it for years, then gave up on it for several years, and only after making a trip on the Hudson River did he decide to make this book about an adventure travelling down a river instead. Still doesn't explain the contrived ending though.

I never did think this book was anything special. I guess it was creative and influential for the time, but it doesn't hold up well compared to other books from the time, including Twain's other work.

2

Elmfield77 t1_jedr54p wrote

You're not alone. I remember being really irked by the last few chapters and how all of Huck's character development seemed to get tossed out the window

0

Lazaruzo t1_jeed8ym wrote

It’s a book you needed to read when you’re young I feel , too young to notice the glaring racial problems and can just enjoy the adventure.

I read it young and coming back to it as an adult the nostalgia Carries it because some of toms behavior is appalling.

0