Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

FatherOfBlaise t1_it9di9c wrote

That’s like saying there’s no bad people only bad parents

48

the_original_Retro t1_itbl4pm wrote

Reading this and the other comments, I think that if the artist was deliberately cultivating a mixed message in this work, they succeeded wildly.

4

userhasleftchat t1_itbliby wrote

If that is the case, then I actually like the piece. I just don’t know what the artist’s intention is.

I disagree with the oversimplified feel-good “no bad dogs, only bad owners” rhetoric.

4

acidicloud t1_itfjt3v wrote

Not the same. Kids grow up into adults responsible for their own actions, dogs stay at the mentality of a 2yo

1

BadNewsSherBear t1_itou0bk wrote

Interestingly, I heard (second- or third-hand) that many bully breeds begin cognitive decline after just a few years of age. I didn't see a reliable source or anything and don't care to look it up - could be fabricated or true of other breeds as well. My point is just that the maximum cognitive human age of comparison may not even last that long before the fear and confusion of dementia start to set in.

1

Tips__ t1_it9935m wrote

Good art! I disagree with the message though.

26

[deleted] t1_it8wton wrote

[deleted]

25

BadNewsSherBear t1_itavkw7 wrote

I honestly can't tell if the text in the drawing is meant to be satirical and sarcastic or not.. like, the people who say this are the mouthpieces of inherently dangerous breeds, which is why the words are formed by its barking or whatever.

5

the_original_Retro t1_itbke3q wrote

Yup. The collar adds to the confusion and IMO the "art" in the work because of that confusion. You only put a collar like that on an animal when you WANT it to be intimidating and perceived as vicious (so, the owner). However, the dog looks almost undead or rabid or something.

Really mixed on this; I like the piece but hate the message.

2

iputglassinmyvagina t1_itbm68a wrote

I’m pretty sure there’s a decent amount of people that put spikey collars on their dogs cuz they think it looks cool. Like I own a couple of spikey chokers for myself and if I had a dog I think it would be cute to get it a matching collar

3

the_original_Retro t1_itbmogx wrote

Have a look at the specific collar of the dog in the artwork again, and tell me how that's "cute" to anyone that doesn't know you.

You might think it's cool yourself but honestly, that's irrelevant to the fact that that particular collar on that particular dog breed clearly sends a message that is not "cute".

0

userhasleftchat t1_itc228c wrote

That’s what I was wondering about.

If intended to be satirical, then it’s actually an awesome piece.

1

Red__system t1_it90ar8 wrote

Well there it is, the stupidest thing I’ve read/seen so far today. I hope this is satirical. Cool story tho.

−32

Bashcypher t1_it95nva wrote

Its unequivocally proven that genetic disorders and genetic breeding for violence create the occasional dog that needs to be put down. Look up pitbulls that cant stop chasing their tail. High prey drive. Rage syndrome.

You should read up.

17

Luigihiji t1_it95cma wrote

there's no coincidence that two breeds make up most of the human deaths (like 70%) and literally every other breed makes up the other 30

9

Time-Wait t1_itaes5s wrote

Can you please provide data for this assertion?

2

Luigihiji t1_itahi1a wrote

Just Google "dog kills by breed"

2

Time-Wait t1_itaiv11 wrote

I just did. So the answer is no you can’t .

−8

Luigihiji t1_itamhk8 wrote

literally the first thing that comes up but ok

Rottweilers and pit bulls account for 76% of fatalities since 2016. I under shot it

9

Time-Wait t1_itb6rdj wrote

Where is the Doberman on this list?

Breed Deaths % of Total

Pit bull 284 65.6%

Rottweiler 45 10.4%

German shepherd 20 4.6%

Mixed-breed 17 3.9%

American bulldog 15 3.5%

Mastiff/Bullmastiff 14 3.2%

Husky 13 3.0%

Unknown/unreleased 11 2.5%

Labrador retriever 9 2.1%

Boxer 7 1.6%

0

Luigihiji t1_itcge8o wrote

Irrelevant. We are talking about rottweilers and pit bulls. This is not the only article going over these numbers and the fact you can't find any tells me you're just dense

0

the_original_Retro t1_itbl0m5 wrote

I don't understand what you're trying to say here. Is it because the dog in the pic is a doberman? How is that a contribution to the overall argument here?

That doberman was almost certainly selected by the artist because dobermans are very much perceived as "guard dogs" and employed in that role. They wanted a vicious-looking dog to represent the point, and got one.

−1

SwiggityStag t1_it991pe wrote

Can't possibly be that those specific breeds are the ones usually chosen by people seeking to train a dog to be aggressive...

1

aioncan t1_itaivht wrote

You’re absolutely right. There’s no way genetics have an effect on dog behavior

3

the_original_Retro t1_itbkmiv wrote

It's a two part problem dude.

People that want to be the "alpha" owner of an animal companion that accentuates their tough-guy image or in their mind offers them the security of helping to defend their home are absolutely part of the problem.

The breed of dog and its greater susceptibility to overly brutal attacks is the other contributor.

0

SwiggityStag t1_itbol95 wrote

Oh yeah no doubt that the breed is capable of doing a ton of damage, but they can also be trained properly to be docile from an early age by an experienced owner, which happens to not be the demographic pit bulls are most popular with.

There are other breeds that could do a lot of damage and tend to have an aggressive temperament if they're not trained properly. For example, German Shepherds are bred for jobs that require aggression, and you're almost twice as likely to die if you're attacked by a German Shepherd due to the pulling and tearing action they're bred for. However, they're not popular for dog fighting, and they fell out of popularity as guard dogs too for various reasons, and people generally understand that they're not a dog for inexperienced owners.

While what the breed is capable of is definitely a factor, I think if it was mainly about the damage a dog can do and the nature of the jobs they were bred for, we'd be seeing a lot more attacks from guard dog and hunting dog breeds.

1

the_original_Retro t1_itbvjxt wrote

I agree with your some of your points but not with others.

There are documented attacks by some extremely well trained pit bulls from loving families that focused on discipline and good rearing. The issue is ALSO GENETIC. Sometimes that cannot be overcome by any amount of training.

And I don't agree about your listing of hunting dogs in the same category of guard dogs. I have many friends with retriever hunting animals. They are not the same as guard dogs in either breed or function. I don't know enough without research to talk about general temperament, and can only speak anecdotally on this so will refrain.

0

SwiggityStag t1_itc2bii wrote

Pretty much any breed has had incidents where a well trained, well cared for dog can bite. Even family labradors have cases like that. Usually they're caused by high stress situations, pain or illness, not some random decision to become violent for the sake of it. Maybe some breeds have an inclination to be more short tempered, but that doesn't mean that they're attacking for no reason. It just means that they need an owner who understands how to handle their dog in those situations.

I included hunting dogs because certain breeds of dogs bred for actual killing of prey animals can be fairly aggressive. Jack Russel Terriers for example are among some of the highest rates of aggression as a breed, but because of their size they can't do a lot of damage to a human. They do harm a lot of other dogs and pets in general when not properly trained though, which is why a good owner will make sure to introduce them to other dogs at an early age.

0

the_original_Retro t1_itc330n wrote

>It just means that they need an owner who understands how to handle their dog in those situations.

Proven incorrect many times over.

I'm sorry you don't understand this. There is no such thing as 100% perfect discipline in all possible situations, and not everyone uses a 100% effective restraining mechanism all the time for 100% of the dog's life. That just isn't reality.

And some breeds are more susceptible to breaking discipline than others.

0

SwiggityStag t1_itc3sol wrote

No, there's no such thing as a 100% chance of prevention for anything, but there's mostly preventable. There's still a chance that your perfectly docile family dog will get stressed and bite regardless of breed. You can lower that chance by choosing a breed of dog you're able to deal with, training it properly and being aware of its needs.

Different breeds require different levels and styles of discipline, that's why certain breeds of dog aren't good for inexperienced owners, and every dog has boundaries that need to be respected. That doesn't make them "bad".

1

userhasleftchat t1_itc2ton wrote

Hey, sorry for the rude initial comment. I think I woke up crankier than usual tbh. Read my other comments on this post.

I’m actually genuinely curious to know the intent behind the piece. I should have led with that, so I do apologize again.

Also, not sure why you got so many downvotes.

2

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_it9y69b wrote

I like the art a lot, but I find the message to be--with all due respect--completely ignorant. You should do more research on the subject before making activist art.

25

Lemon_boy89 t1_itbrrc5 wrote

So if somebody does research on a controversial matter and doesn't reach the exact same conclusion as you did they just haven't done any and are completely ignorant. Got it.

0

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_itbsslp wrote

There are facts and there are opinions.

It is a scientific fact that dogs' aggression differs by breed. Again, not a matter of opinion.

I say to you as well, do some research. Takes one google search.

7

Lemon_boy89 t1_itbttal wrote

I don't think that's the point, when you adopt for example a pit bull you have responsibility over it and have to raise it so that it doesn't attack others, I know that some breeds are more easily aggrivated.

−5

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_itbuuw8 wrote

It says "no bad dogs, only bad owners" which is very often said by pit bull supporters. The truth is that it is in certain dogs' blood to kill.

Retrievers retrieve. Shepards herd. Pit bulls kill.

You can give certain breeds love and care it's whole life and it can still tear your throat out without a second's hesitation. It's no coincidence that literally every other dog attack is a pit. They're bred to fight. Hence the name "pit bull".

8

unofficialsubscriber t1_itaesr8 wrote

You should really pay more attention to when you use the phrase "you should" at people. It's inconsiderate and disrespectful. You basically just told this guy that you think he's not allowed to have an opinion just because you don't like his.

Nice going, really makes you sound like a controlling douchebag. With all due respect of course...

−31

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_itaeylv wrote

No.

There are facts and there is opinion. OP is factually incorrect. Takes 5 minutes of google searching, but you couldn't be bothered I guess.

16

unofficialsubscriber t1_itafpfg wrote

I don't think I ever gave the impression that I give a shit. I meant to call you a douchebag.

How's that for facts?

−21

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_itagclt wrote

And there you go. Realizing you're wrong and resorting to name-calling like a 12-year old boy. It is, however, safe to say I've made my point clear enough.

15

unofficialsubscriber t1_itagw27 wrote

And there you go, visiting my intentions just feel better about yourself. It's safe to say I still don't give a damn what you think, but go ahead and keep it coming if you like. I'll be around...

−19

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_itah3vf wrote

Sorry, did I ask if you give a damn? You replied to my comment with fists swinging, and when I put it down you say "I don't give a damn"? I mean, seriously?

Also, feel free to block me to appear as though you got the last word. Lots of people do it for some mysterious reason.

5

unofficialsubscriber t1_itahqkx wrote

Did I ask what you think?

Also, make me...

−3

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_itahvpn wrote

Funny because I don't exactly recall asking for your thoughts either. Hypocrite.

4

unofficialsubscriber t1_itai0pu wrote

hYpOcRiTe!

−2

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_itai2xa wrote

Least insane redditor 👆

4

unofficialsubscriber t1_itaic4x wrote

Block me then, why haven't you already? I mean you keep replying...

0

Guilty__Pyrite__ t1_itaigbx wrote

Because I find you intriguing. Not necessarily in a good or bad way, just kind of passively entertaining.

3

comradoge t1_itba4qe wrote

Oh, of course it has to be that avatar thing again! Never really disappoints.

1

asexuowl t1_it9eetz wrote

The art is amazing! That is not questionable! However, like others are saying: prey drive + temperament are genetic. There is no question that many dog breeds have higher prey drive (all terriers for example.. ALL .. APBT/pitbull mix are the largest terriers ..) We do not question that not all households can handle the work drive of a malinois, or the herding instinct of a collie breed. Yet we ignore the breed specific prey+hunt drive in many breeds, thus failing and anthropmorphising them. If you want to TRULY advocate and do best for these dogs, truly learn the body language+tendencies and be proactive. Or continue babying them and being apart of the reason they get the chance to kill/harm, either way idc.

22

BadNewsSherBear t1_itavmzs wrote

I honestly can't tell if the text in the drawing is meant to be satirical and sarcastic or not.. like, the people who say this are the mouthpieces of inherently dangerous breeds, which is why the words are formed by its barking or whatever.

18

The_Rat_Plague t1_it9svjd wrote

r/reactivedogs would highly disagree with this statement.

10

mushroom4two t1_it9u5z4 wrote

Theres a lot of downvoted comments here, why is that?

6

PtrWalnuts t1_ita3upy wrote

Because of pitbulls.

40

AtherisNai t1_itbmtvl wrote

This. 95+% of the time there’s a dog attack that’s BAD, it involves a pit. I LOVE dogs. I don’t like pitbulls.

6

RustedRuss t1_itacx5q wrote

Everyone is talking about the message, but what I’m wondering is different. Did you borrow this style from a Soviet era propaganda poster? It has the exact same color palette and style.

4

Aether_genes t1_itar7c4 wrote

Really? Stray dogs in my country also bites and hurts a lot of passer-by doing absolutely nothing.

3

Lemon_boy89 t1_itbs76c wrote

Yeah but those can't be called bad dogs, bad to humans? Sure, does that make them bad dogs? No, I mean we are considered bad by dogs when we enter their teritory but are we bad people? No. In conclusion I don't think this debate will ever go anywhere, goodbye

2

TurnerDiagonal t1_itcbsfh wrote

Wow youre so clever for realizing bad is a relative term. Bad dog means problematic to humans, stop with the tactical context denial.

2

Lemon_boy89 t1_itcglwi wrote

Well if that was the case I don't think anybody would disagree there are bad dogs.

1

Aether_genes t1_itbt83h wrote

I said thats one of the reasons. Also in this world when a man is mentally unstable and he commits crimes for example, like in the case of a cannibalistic serial killer, majority consideres that as a bad or evil person. Regardless of the fact that he is mentally unstable will people call him good person? No. Same logic goes to dogs.

0

Lemon_boy89 t1_itbtxk9 wrote

I don't think that's a suitable example, you're comparing a man killing his kind and eating them for fun to an aggrivated dog.

2

Aether_genes t1_itbultd wrote

Even if its a serial killer hurting others, people would have the same reaction.

0

Lemon_boy89 t1_itbv4jc wrote

A serial killer is still a mammal of the same intellect killing for fun and not a mammal of lower intellect defending it's territory, nor a different mammal with rabies that can't control it's agrevation. Need I explain further?

1

Aether_genes t1_itbxec8 wrote

And how does that help not comparing them? Of course a serial killer would think its fun because he would have lost all sense of humanity the day he went insane. Why would dogs gone insane and rabid be treated differently

0

Lemon_boy89 t1_itc24u5 wrote

Because they're dogs and don't find it fun, I don't think you'd exactly be having fun if you were to attack everybody you see because you couldn't control yourself and are constantly feeling anger at everything that moves. They're sick and not by choice unlike serial killers who choose to become what they are, in most cases.

0

Aether_genes t1_itc546l wrote

How can u confirm dogs don't find it fun? Also another major group of dogs randomly attack a non provocative person because they would want to asset dominance, is there a need to do that? No. Is the person trying to make contact in any way? No. Is the person having fun? No. Is the dog having fun while having dominance? Yes. Now talking about sick dogs, maybe they got sick at birth or later in life. How can you not say the same for the serial killer hurting people? They could be sick or mentally confused from birth or later in life. And most are. Sometimes the person wouldn't have had the choice to choose. Your logic is so flawed

0

Lemon_boy89 t1_itc6ezb wrote

Because they are literally sick, rabies causes dogs to be anxious, fearful and constantly agitated, those don't sound like fun feelings to me. Yes to the dog the need is there, you step into it's domaine, you're the attacker, but the dog doesn't understand how society works so how would it know it has to buy the land it calls it's territory, I can't say the same because serial killers make a choice to kill, there is usually nothing wrong with them, if they were rabid like dogs they wouldn't be able to clean everything up and be smart about killing, even if they do have a mental problem, the first time they kill is by choice, they may have less control as time passes but the first time, for a SERIAL killer, is a choice.

1

Aether_genes t1_itc84p7 wrote

Fr dude your logic is so flawed. Its like you're trying with every last breath to defends dogs like they're your gods and savior Btw don't confuse between a dog putting dominance over someone and a rabid dog. Those are two whole separate topics I talked about back there. Also you slow? I said a perfectly non provocative person, that means who doesn't even steps into the dogs territory either. Again a person with mental issues at birth do not have a choice because they're damaged from the start. And even a rabid dog would know killing is ultimately bad. In short , a dog killing a person and human killing a person and In return a dog killing a dog or a person killing a dog should all face the same consequences. Could change if the dog or the human is suffering mental illness. If you can't process that then your logic and reasoning is as bad as your delusions

1

Lemon_boy89 t1_itc92lk wrote

What? No I'm not I'm quite neutral towards dogs, but I have a different logic than yours which doesn't mean it's flawed, logic is based on knowledge and so far you haven't really enlightened me about anything you just say your logic is flawed.

2

Aether_genes t1_itc9ugl wrote

I really can't enlighten anyone who can't process basic sentences. I have written the same logical explanation I gave before over again, and you have only responded with answers that barely makes any sense regarding with logic. So your logic could actually be flawed. Btw you say you're neutral against dogs yet your points and words say otherwise lol

1

Lemon_boy89 t1_itcauwi wrote

I'm sorry but what's logical about a dog killing a dog having the same outcome as a man killing a man, a dogs morales are different from those of a man, if you would punish a dog for killing a dog the same way you'd punish a human for killing a man, not only your logic but your morale is flawed, also like if my morale was actually flawed and you actually were presenting good arguments, I'd agree but you have not typed out a single sentence based on facts, just random stuff that'd come to mind, you call my logic flawed yet you can't say why, because I don't think the same way you do? Who's logic is really flawed here

2

Aether_genes t1_itcc4rb wrote

Oh so you just ignore whatever I said about dog killing a man or a man killing a dog? And then proceed to complain about my morale while visibly and purposely interpreting the wrong side of the information. Even after that you can't present different consequences to different animals pulling the same act thats why I think your logic is downright flawed. Lmaoo you complain about me calling your logic flawed while proceeding to the same, so you're also a hypocrite. Also You wouldn't agree either way because from what I've collected from the past point you really like to play with words while being manipulative and not presenting with coherent points.

1

Lemon_boy89 t1_itc9ncg wrote

I have never heard of a dog attacking a human to assert dominance we are of a different species, unless it sees us as part of its pack or family, it won't try to assert dominance, your logic in my opinion is mostly based on assumptions which is why you jump to belittling me and trying to gaslight me whenever you don't have an appropriate response, get off your high horse

1

Aether_genes t1_itcb1ni wrote

I'm sorry if your act of malding is clouding your way to reply with actual points. While if you are actually project at me then I'm not on a high horse here, you are. You talk about assumptions while you assume I'm trying to gaslight you? Are you are trying to divert this argument to something irrelevant and false? Lol nice try. Btw I did say in my country in first comment so you may have never heard of it but I have and seen it too, so don't try to manipulate what I saw as illogical

1

Lemon_boy89 t1_itcbbk3 wrote

Aughhhhhh, aughhhhhhh

1

Lemon_boy89 t1_itc6mek wrote

Also my logic isn't flawed you just think of your own logic as complete and flawless, therefore you can't accept anything I say and repeat the same sentences by changing the locations of the words and sentences. This is pointless.

1

Aether_genes t1_itc94sb wrote

You logic is can be countered with basic human morals and reasoning, thats why simply its flawed. The only one here who's rewriting the same sentences again is you, and asking about the same point I previously wrote about while the answer being there. Yeah its is pointless arguing with you

1

SwiggityStag t1_itburij wrote

Why are people so eager to assign human traits to animals? Humans are capable of understanding the concept of right or wrong based on morals. Dogs are not. A dog understands what it needs to do in order to survive, and what it is taught it is and isn't supposed to do by its social group. A dog doesn't wake up one day, think "hell yeah I'm going to bite a bunch of people!", it either sees a person as a threat or has been taught that it is supposed to bite people. Animals don't understand human morals.

1

Aether_genes t1_itbvyvx wrote

So your whole point is that humans should sacrifice their own survival instincts and judgment and consider such dogs as good? People have their own shit to deal with, they're don't dwell in their basements all the time like you do and when rabid dog comes at someone to attack it is normal to consider them as evil or bad at the moment. Also why shouldn't mentally unstable people have the same morals? Their unfit mental conditions would basically make them same as wild animals

0

SwiggityStag t1_itbxbk6 wrote

My point is that a dog can do something we consider wrong but they don't do it for the sake of doing something morally wrong, because they don't and can't comprehend the concept of morals. An animal can't make the choice to do something evil because they don't know what evil is. An animal won't do something just for the sake of being cruel. I really can't simplify it for you more than that.

If someone is genuinely incapable of understanding the concept of right and wrong, no I wouldn't consider them to be evil, that would require them to deliberately do something bad. Most people are raised being taught the difference between right and wrong so it's very unlikely to happen. Dangerous? Of course. Evil? No.

Not everything is black and white, just like not everyone who disagrees with you is an evil meanie who only exists to hurt your poor little feelings.

1

Aether_genes t1_itbywgl wrote

Lol a deranged person also must have lost all sense of right and wrong just a like a crazed dog. Their morals could be reduced to nothingness. The unstable human could be as brain dead and have reduced intelligent to that of a dog and doesn't mean you can treat them differently. Not to mention its so clear you're narrating every sad moment and breakdowns happening to you and writing it out there. Projecting at its finest

0

SwiggityStag t1_itc2yuw wrote

Man, you really are incapable of talking to someone who disagrees with you without boiling over with rage. Get some therapy or something. Anyway I'm blocking you now because this is stupid, that should keep you raging for a while

Edit: Holy shit the poor kid made an alt account just to "win". I have literally never seen anyone do that before. Incredible. Very sad.

1

SwiggityStag t1_itbax8p wrote

The fact that they were dumped onto the street to fend for themselves, and most likely treated badly by humans for being "vermin" and therefore see them as a threat might have something to do with it. Just a guess.

−2

Aether_genes t1_itbd98o wrote

"The fact"? that they were dumped onto the street? do u live where I do or smth? Some dogs were rabid and that was one of the reason they went haywire not maybe because "humans bad". There may be some high record of bad people in other nations but not here.

pseudo-intellect at its finest

0

SwiggityStag t1_itbeziu wrote

Lol okay, nobody ever does anything bad and every dog that ever gets dumped is an evil rabid hellhound just because you don't live in a developing country. You keep believing that.

2

Aether_genes t1_itbhiy6 wrote

🤣 ok clown. Keeping assuming stuff you concluded in your lonely space. Doesn't change the fact I live in a developing country

Btw atleast I believe what I saw. I never said nobody ever does anything bad. But oh sure mr pseudo intellect smartass here thinks something he concluded based on his imagination is right. Right, your imagination of what I saw vs what I actually saw, keep believing that

−2

SwiggityStag t1_itbi7kx wrote

Mhm, I'm sure you know everything about every stray dog ever just from looking at some, as well as everything about me from two messages on the internet. I'm sure Mensa are desperately searching for you as we speak. Good job buddy. You're so smart that even reality has nothing on you.

Ps: Not everyone who disagrees with you is "pseudo intellectual", throwing out words you heard a guy say on the internet one time doesn't make you smart. I never claimed to be anything but a random guy of average intelligence, it doesn't take a genius to see how stupid what you said is

2

Aether_genes t1_itbk8st wrote

I didn't even say that? 💀 Writing random crap, changing the meaning of the sentences, pretending to be the know it all pseudo intellectual? Copium lol.

−1

SwiggityStag t1_itbkrdf wrote

Do you know any words besides "pseudo-intellectual" by any chance, or is that the only big word that your internet "debater" friends taught you? I mean I expected you to not know what it means but this is just getting sad

1

Aether_genes t1_itbubhu wrote

Bro its not anymore sad than thinking you're that all-knowing pseudo intellect just because u watched rick and morty a few times. But sure keep on crying in a corner feeling you have achieved something in your life by being a keyboard warrior.

0

SwiggityStag t1_itbvbxb wrote

Question: Are you 12? You need to learn to understand that not everyone who disagrees with you is [insert "fallacy" or other super smart debate word you saw that you don't know the meaning of]

Seriously dude, this is the most "keyboard warrior" behaviour I've ever seen. Would it make you feel better if I told you that you won the internet argument? Do you want to add it to your little tally board? Here you go buddy, just for you. Something to hinge your self esteem on. I concede, you win the stupid pointless internet argument.

1

Aether_genes t1_itbwoqg wrote

did I hit a nerve? I think you should take your own offerings and maybe that may make you feel better about yourself. As for resorting to childish insults and no coherent points, it really does look like the word pseudo intellect suits you

0

SwiggityStag t1_itbxjix wrote

Lol, your entire response has been nothing but insults but go off. I hope that once the hormones calm down you'll stop being so damn angry, it seems like a miserable way to live. Not everyone is as angry about the opinions of strangers on the internet btw

1

Aether_genes t1_itbzoju wrote

I think I'm very calm but of course the pseudo intellectual would think he knows best about some stranger. It should also be mentioned that if you think I'm the one insults you should probably go through your own set of replies that have a very aggressive tone of insults, probably typed after having a couple of breakdowns. Its just a comment, no need to throw a fit lmao

0

SwiggityStag t1_itc2rqm wrote

I dunno man, sounds like you're seething to me with all the petty insults. Bet you're shaking with rage right now. Stay mad.

Edit: Nothing says shaking with rage like literally creating an entire alt account to "win". That's hilarious

1

comradoge t1_itbalk2 wrote

There is no faulty cars, only drunk drivers!

3

TurnerDiagonal t1_itcamys wrote

No engine is inherently faster or more powerful than any other engine. Car performance is all down to who's driving.

1

iLoveJohnMalkovich t1_itbff1a wrote

Cool style, but what you’re claiming simply isn’t true.

3

malkumecks t1_itbjpyt wrote

Nah fam…. Plenty of bad dogs out there. I’ve seen a pit strolling down the middle of the road and attack one of my tires as I drove by. Would’ve hated to see what it would’ve done if I was waking. Doesn’t matter if it’s owners sucked or not. It was still a bad dog.

3

TurnerDiagonal t1_itca7fy wrote

There are very aggressive breeds that are expensive, rare and difficult to obtain especially for normal people who just want a dog. The potentially dangerous nature of these dogs is not disputed. But when any 20 year old girl can adopt a pitbull from the shelter then suddenly all dogs are intrinsically the same and if you don't think so you're dog racist. It's all so tiresome.

3

mytendies t1_it9p989 wrote

There are bad dogs in a normal distribution of dogs.

Not all dogs go to heaven either

2

Carbon_is_Neat t1_itbbhx6 wrote

The art isn't bad skill-wise but the message is terrible and perhaps a deliberate oversimplification

2

Cubensio t1_itbonzh wrote

I’ve seen packs of dogs tear cats and bunnies to shreds for fun, as in not for food but just straight up killing for sport. No owners to blame. 👀

2

Lemon_boy89 t1_itbsdnd wrote

Yeah, but that's just nature I don't think wild dogs are the same thing as pets nor are the dogs who tear things to shreds "bad"

0

Austoniooo t1_itboyy5 wrote

Ehhhhhh nice thought but not 100% accurate

2

a-m-watercolor t1_itcad9e wrote

Did this thread get brigaded by r/banpitbulls and r/pitbullhate?

2

Ok_Relationship3137 t1_itasd2o wrote

That is a great perspective that i had never thought about before

1

Nikusson t1_itbcr4p wrote

Except for chihuahuas, those maniacs are crazy no matter the owner

1

Jettcycle t1_itbonij wrote

Pitbulls: that's a mighty fine toddler you got there

1

Oddarette t1_itby100 wrote

I own a dog with a prey drive. I was warned at the pound when I adopted her. She is great with people but will attack other dogs. We got her comfortable with our other dog, fortunately because they met and bonded when they were puppies, before her drive fully developed. Random dogs? Nope. No amount of training will get rid of her hair trigger to attack. Does that make me a bad owner? Does that make her a bad dog? She’s not a pit pull, she’s a husky/malamute, also high up there on the aggressive breed list. Yes, there is an aggressive breed list. It’s not made up.

1

EMPulseKC t1_itajt72 wrote

Someone hasn't seen "Cujo."

0

-Peachsoup- t1_itbi07n wrote

Cujo had rabies

3

JonnySnowflake t1_itbt4ev wrote

Cujo is the story of a boy on vacation worrying about his dog while an adulterous woman kills it

2

Specialist-Sound5746 t1_itcgtac wrote

Wow dude people have alot to say. I absolutely love your image and the message is very clear! I just don't like dogs because of the poop I step in. Clearly not the dogs fault 🙄

0

[deleted] t1_itd52iu wrote

there's a reason pitbulls are banned in certain countries

0